The Android tablet market is heating up, with Xiaomi and OnePlus offering compelling options at different price points. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro aims for near-flagship performance with its cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, while the OnePlus Pad Lite focuses on delivering a solid experience at a more accessible price with the MediaTek Helio G100. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency. However, the OnePlus Pad Lite provides a compelling value proposition for casual users who prioritize affordability and don't require top-tier performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - cellular model only |
| 4G bands | - | LTE - cellular model only |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 25 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 25 | Available. Released 2025, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | - |
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 173.4 x 5.8 mm (9.89 x 6.83 x 0.23 in) | 254.9 x 166.5 x 7.4 mm (10.04 x 6.56 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | No | Yes - cellular model only |
| Weight | 485 g or 494 g (1.07 lb) | 530 g (1.17 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~344 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~207 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.2 inches, 373.7 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 347.5 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 5 MP |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers, Hi-Res audio) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, (cellular model only) - unconfirmed |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+
22.5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 9200 mAh | Li-Po 9340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Aero Blue |
| Models | - | OPD2480 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- Significantly faster processor with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 67W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- 22.5W reverse wired charging for added versatility
- Likely higher price point
- Potential for higher heat output under sustained load (though 3nm helps)
OnePlus Pad Lite
- More affordable price
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Sufficient for casual gaming and media consumption
- Slower processor compared to the Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Slower 33W charging
- Lacks reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
While both tablets likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in their processing power, impacting UI responsiveness. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, allows for smoother animations and faster app loading times. The OnePlus Pad Lite’s Helio G100, on a 6nm node, will deliver a competent experience, but will struggle with graphically intensive applications. Without display specs, we can assume the Pad 8 Pro’s chipset will contribute to a more fluid visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is less critical. However, the absence of detailed camera specifications suggests both tablets likely feature modest camera setups. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. We can assume the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro, being the higher-end device, may have slightly better image processing capabilities, but this is speculative. The focus should be on video conferencing and casual snapshots, where both tablets will likely suffice.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, featuring Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz, represents a substantial upgrade over the OnePlus Pad Lite’s MediaTek Helio G100. The Snapdragon’s architecture, with its Phoenix cores, is designed for sustained performance and efficiency, crucial for demanding tasks. The Helio G100’s Cortex-A76 and A55 cores, while capable, are older generation and less efficient. This translates to a noticeable difference in gaming performance, multitasking, and overall responsiveness, favoring the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro’s 67W wired charging is a major advantage, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the OnePlus Pad Lite’s 33W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed means less downtime. The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity differences. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro also offers 22.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the OnePlus Pad Lite, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro if you need a tablet for demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, or gaming, and appreciate the benefits of faster charging and a more powerful processor. Buy the OnePlus Pad Lite if you prefer a more affordable tablet for everyday tasks like browsing, streaming, and light productivity, and are willing to compromise on raw performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G100 in the OnePlus Pad Lite struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the MediaTek Helio G100 is likely to struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact at higher settings. You'll likely need to lower the graphics settings and resolution to achieve a playable frame rate. The Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro will provide a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the OnePlus Pad Lite?
The 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro will significantly reduce charging times. While exact times depend on battery capacity (not specified), expect a 0-100% charge to be considerably faster – potentially 30-50% quicker – than the OnePlus Pad Lite. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently use their tablet throughout the day.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8 Elite likely to overheat during extended gaming sessions on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro?
While powerful, the Snapdragon 8 Elite's 3nm process is designed to improve thermal efficiency. However, sustained high loads will inevitably generate heat. Xiaomi likely incorporates thermal management solutions (heat pipes, graphite sheets) to mitigate throttling. It's unlikely to overheat to the point of being unusable, but some performance throttling is possible during prolonged gaming.
