The large-screen Android tablet market is heating up, with Xiaomi and Honor both offering compelling options. The Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 arrives with a cutting-edge 3nm Xring O1 chipset and blazing-fast 120W charging, while the Honor Pad 9 Pro leverages the established Mediatek Dimensity 8100. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 is the clear winner. Its Xring O1 chipset, built on a 3nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Honor Pad 9 Pro’s 5nm Dimensity 8100. While the Honor Pad 9 Pro offers a respectable experience, the Xiaomi’s charging speed and potential for sustained performance give it the edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | N/A | No |
| GPRS | N/A | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 26 | 2024, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 26 | Available. Released 2024, July 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 279.1 x 192 x 5.8 mm (10.99 x 7.56 x 0.23 in) | 277 x 179.9 x 6.6 mm (10.91 x 7.08 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 576 g or 585 g (1.27 lb) | 589 g (1.30 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 or Panda-X | - |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~308 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.5 inches, 465.5 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 10-core (2x3.4GHz Cortex-X925 & 4x3.4GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.9GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Xring O1 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, Magic OS 8.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers, with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, magnetic accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+
7.5W reverse wired | 35W wired |
| Type | 10610 mAh | Li-Po 10050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Titanium Silver, Basalt Gray | Sky Blue, Star Gray |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- More powerful and efficient Xring O1 chipset (3nm)
- Advanced 10-core CPU configuration
- Supports PD3.0, QC3+, and reverse wired charging
- Potential for higher price
- Thermal management needs to be verified under sustained load
Honor Pad 9 Pro
- Proven Dimensity 8100 performance
- Likely more affordable price point
- Good balance of performance and efficiency
- Reliable and established chipset
- Slower 35W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Xring O1
Display Comparison
While both tablets likely feature high-resolution displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Display quality will be a key differentiator, but without specific nit brightness or panel technology details, it's difficult to declare a winner. However, the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro’s more powerful chipset could potentially support more advanced display features like higher refresh rates or more sophisticated image processing for improved visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the focus on performance in the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro, it’s reasonable to assume a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Xring O1 chipset, potentially leading to better image processing capabilities. The Honor Pad 9 Pro likely relies on the Dimensity 8100’s ISP, which is competent but less cutting-edge. The absence of details on OIS or sensor size makes a definitive statement impossible, but the Xiaomi’s chipset advantage suggests a potential edge in image quality.
Performance
The Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro’s Xring O1 chipset, fabricated on a 3nm process, represents a substantial leap forward in efficiency and transistor density compared to the Honor Pad 9 Pro’s 5nm Dimensity 8100. The Xring O1’s 10-core configuration (2x3.4GHz Cortex-X925, 4x3.4GHz Cortex-A725, 2x1.9GHz Cortex-A725, 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520) is architecturally superior to the Dimensity 8100’s octa-core setup (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-X925 cores in the Xiaomi offer significantly higher peak performance, while the combination of A725 and A520 cores provides a balance of power and efficiency. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved performance in demanding applications. The Dimensity 8100 is still a capable chip, but the Xring O1’s advanced architecture and process node provide a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, significantly outpacing the Honor Pad 9 Pro’s 35W charging. This means the Xiaomi can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity (mAh) isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Xiaomi also supports PD3.0, QC3+, and 7.5W reverse wired charging, offering greater versatility. The Honor Pad 9 Pro’s 35W charging is adequate but doesn’t offer the same level of convenience as the Xiaomi’s ultra-fast charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 if you demand the highest possible performance for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or gaming, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. Buy the Honor Pad 9 Pro if you prioritize a balanced experience with a proven chipset and are less concerned with having the absolute latest technology, potentially at a lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Xring O1 chipset in the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The 3nm process node of the Xring O1 is designed for improved thermal efficiency. However, sustained peak performance can still generate heat. Xiaomi will likely employ advanced cooling solutions (details not provided) to mitigate throttling. Real-world testing will be crucial to determine the extent of any thermal limitations.
❓ Is the Dimensity 8100 in the Honor Pad 9 Pro still capable of handling demanding games and applications?
Yes, the Dimensity 8100 is a very capable chipset and can handle most Android games and applications smoothly. While it doesn't match the raw power of the Xring O1, it provides a solid and reliable performance experience for the majority of users.
❓ How long does it realistically take to charge the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 from 0% to 100% with the 120W charger?
With 120W charging, the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 is expected to charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 30-40 minutes, depending on battery capacity and charging conditions. This is significantly faster than the Honor Pad 9 Pro’s 35W charging.
