The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra and Oppo Find N3 Flip represent divergent paths in mobile innovation. The Pad 7 Ultra aims to redefine tablet performance, while the Find N3 Flip pushes the boundaries of foldable phone design. This comparison dissects their core strengths, revealing which device best suits your needs – raw processing power for demanding tasks or a pocketable, versatile foldable experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing uncompromised performance and a large-screen experience, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Xring O1 chipset and 120W charging offer a significant advantage. However, the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s unique foldable form factor and excellent battery endurance make it compelling for those valuing portability and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 22 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 22 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 305.8 x 207.5 x 5.1 mm (12.04 x 8.17 x 0.20 in) | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 609 g or 619 g (1.34 lb) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~275 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 14.0 inches, 583.9 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 4800Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1600 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 10-core (2x3.7GHz Cortex-X925 & 4x3.4GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.9GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Xring O1 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF
48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (data transfer only) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | No | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0
7.5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 12000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | - | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | About 700 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Unmatched processing power with the Xring O1 chipset.
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging.
- Potential for a larger, higher-resolution display.
- Tablet form factor lacks the portability of a foldable.
- Camera specifications currently unknown.
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- Innovative foldable design for enhanced portability.
- Excellent battery life and endurance.
- High peak brightness for outdoor visibility.
- Dimensity 9200 chipset is less powerful than the Xring O1.
- Slower 44W charging compared to the Pad 7 Ultra.
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a 939 nits max brightness, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the Pad 7 Ultra’s display specs are currently unavailable, its larger tablet form factor suggests a focus on immersive viewing. The Find N3 Flip’s foldable design inherently introduces a crease, a trade-off for its portability. The Pad 7 Ultra, lacking this design constraint, likely prioritizes a seamless, expansive display experience. We anticipate the Pad 7 Ultra will have a higher resolution given its larger size, but without specific data, it's difficult to quantify.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s camera system is a key selling point, though specific details beyond 'Photo / Video' are missing. Foldable phones often prioritize versatile camera setups to compensate for their limited form factor. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra’s camera specs are also currently unknown, but tablets typically focus less on advanced camera features than smartphones. Given the Pad 7 Ultra’s larger size, it *could* accommodate a larger sensor, potentially improving low-light performance, but this is speculative. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible.
Performance
The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra’s Xring O1 chipset, built on a 3nm process, is a significant leap forward. Its 10-core configuration (2x3.7GHz Cortex-X925, 4x3.4GHz Cortex-A725, 2x1.9GHz Cortex-A725, 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520) promises exceptional multi-core performance. In contrast, the Oppo Find N3 Flip utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4nm) with an octa-core setup (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). The 3nm node of the Xring O1 should deliver superior power efficiency and thermal management, potentially allowing for sustained peak performance during intensive tasks. The Cortex-X925 cores in the Pad 7 Ultra are also newer generation than the X3 in the Find N3 Flip, suggesting architectural improvements.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N3 Flip excels in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 12:58h of active use and a 92h endurance rating. This suggests optimized power management and efficient components. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra compensates with incredibly fast 120W wired charging (and PD3.0 support), capable of rapidly replenishing the battery. While the Pad 7 Ultra’s battery capacity is unknown, the 120W charging significantly reduces downtime. The Find N3 Flip’s 44W charging, while respectable, takes 23 minutes to reach 50%, slower than the Pad 7 Ultra’s potential full charge time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra if you need a powerful tablet for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or creative work, and value fast charging. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prefer a compact, versatile device that fits easily into your pocket, offering a unique foldable experience and all-day battery life for typical usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Xring O1 chipset in the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Xring O1’s 3nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While sustained peak performance will inevitably generate heat, the smaller node size and optimized architecture should mitigate throttling compared to larger process nodes like the 4nm Dimensity 9200 in the Oppo Find N3 Flip. However, real-world testing is needed to confirm sustained performance under heavy load.
❓ How does the foldable design of the Oppo Find N3 Flip impact its durability compared to a traditional tablet like the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra?
Foldable phones inherently have more moving parts and a more complex hinge mechanism, potentially making them less durable than a traditional tablet. Oppo has invested heavily in hinge technology to improve reliability, but the crease and potential for hinge wear remain concerns. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, with its rigid construction, is likely more resistant to physical damage.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the Oppo Find N3 Flip sufficient for daily use, or will users experience significant downtime?
While 44W charging isn't slow, it's considerably slower than the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra's 120W charging. The Find N3 Flip's excellent battery life mitigates this somewhat, reducing the frequency of charging. However, users who frequently deplete their battery will experience longer charging times compared to the Pad 7 Ultra.
