The Android tablet market is heating up, with Xiaomi and OnePlus both vying for the performance crown. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra introduces a new, in-house Xring O1 chipset and blazing-fast 120W charging, while the OnePlus Pad Pro leverages the established power of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and sustained performance, the OnePlus Pad Pro with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is the clear winner. However, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra’s 120W charging offers a significant convenience factor, making it ideal for those constantly on the move and needing rapid top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | - | N/A |
| EDGE | N/A | No |
| GPRS | N/A | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 22 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 22 | Available. Released 2024, June 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 305.8 x 207.5 x 5.1 mm (12.04 x 8.17 x 0.20 in) | 268.7 x 195.1 x 6.5 mm (10.58 x 7.68 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 609 g or 619 g (1.34 lb) | 584 g (1.29 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~275 ppi density) | 2120 x 3000 pixels (~304 ppi density) |
| Size | 14.0 inches, 583.9 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.1 inches, 445.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 4800Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 144Hz, 600 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 10-core (2x3.7GHz Cortex-X925 & 4x3.4GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.9GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Xring O1 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, OxygenOS 14.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (data transfer only) | NFC (data sharing only) |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0
7.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, QC |
| Type | 12000 mAh | Li-Po 9510 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Gray, Green |
| Models | - | OPD2404 |
| Price | About 700 EUR | About 370 EUR |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging for minimal downtime.
- Potentially better power efficiency due to the 3nm Xring O1 chipset.
- High clock speeds on the Cortex-X925 cores suggest strong single-core performance.
- Xring O1 chipset is unproven and may suffer from software optimization issues.
- Long-term software support is uncertain compared to OnePlus.
OnePlus Pad Pro
- Proven performance and efficiency of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.
- Mature software ecosystem and likely longer software support from OnePlus.
- Adreno 750 GPU delivers excellent graphics performance.
- Slower 67W charging compared to the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra.
- 4nm process may result in slightly higher thermal output under sustained load.
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing, both tablets are expected to feature high-resolution panels. However, the underlying chipset impacts display responsiveness. The Xring O1’s integrated display engine will be crucial in delivering smooth visuals, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Adreno 750 GPU is a proven performer in driving high refresh rate displays. The choice between them will likely come down to color accuracy and peak brightness, which are currently unknown.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent for both devices. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is less critical than on smartphones. However, a capable camera is still desirable for document scanning and video calls. We anticipate both tablets will feature similar camera setups, focusing on a primary sensor and potentially an ultrawide lens. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to assess which tablet will offer superior image quality.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Pad Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a 1+3+2+2 core configuration, peaking at 3.3 GHz with a Cortex-X4 prime core. This contrasts with the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra’s Xring O1 (3nm) which employs a 2+4+2+2 core setup, reaching 3.7 GHz with Cortex-X925 cores. The 3nm process of the Xring O1 *should* offer better power efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architecture is more mature and benefits from extensive software optimization. The Xring O1’s 10-core design may offer theoretical multi-core advantages, but real-world performance will depend on how well Xiaomi manages thermal throttling. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 750 GPU is a known quantity, while the Xring O1’s GPU performance remains to be seen.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, significantly faster than the OnePlus Pad Pro’s 67W charging. While battery capacity is unknown for both, the faster charging speed of the Xiaomi will translate to significantly reduced downtime. The OnePlus Pad Pro supports PD and QC standards, offering broader compatibility, while the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra also supports PD3.0. The 120W charging will likely offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, providing a comparable overall user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available in a tablet and value the convenience of a quick power boost. Buy the OnePlus Pad Pro if you prioritize sustained gaming performance, demanding multitasking, and benefit from the mature software optimization of the Snapdragon platform. The OnePlus is the better choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Xring O1 chipset in the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The 3nm process of the Xring O1 *should* mitigate thermal issues, but the 10-core design and lack of established thermal profiles raise concerns. Real-world testing will be crucial to determine if Xiaomi has effectively managed heat dissipation. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the OnePlus Pad Pro has a proven track record of thermal management.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra compared to the 67W charging on the OnePlus Pad Pro?
While exact times depend on battery capacity, 120W charging will likely reduce a full charge time by at least 30-45 minutes compared to 67W. This means a potentially full charge in under 30 minutes for the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, versus 45-60 minutes for the OnePlus Pad Pro.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the OnePlus Pad Pro support ray tracing for improved gaming visuals?
Yes, the Adreno 750 GPU within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing, offering more realistic lighting and reflections in compatible games. The Xring O1’s ray tracing capabilities are currently unknown.
❓ What type of storage does each tablet use, and does it impact performance?
While not specified, both tablets are likely to utilize UFS 4.0 storage for fast read/write speeds. Faster storage contributes to quicker app loading times and smoother multitasking. The specific UFS version and implementation can impact performance, but both are expected to offer a premium experience.
