Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro vs Realme Pad X: The Ultimate Tablet Battle

The Android tablet market is heating up, and two contenders are vying for your attention: the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro and the Realme Pad X. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but which one truly delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering superior performance for gaming and demanding tasks. While the Realme Pad X boasts a vibrant display and reverse charging, the Pad 5 Pro's raw power and faster charging make it the overall winner.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Realme Pad X
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42LTE
5G bands1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 Sub6SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model onlyHSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -
Launch
Announced2021, August 102022, May 25
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, August 10Available. Released 2022, June 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, plastic backGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions254.7 x 166.3 x 6.9 mm (10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 in)256.5 x 161.1 x 7.1 mm (10.10 x 6.34 x 0.28 in)
SIMNano-SIM (cellular model only)Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only)
Weight515 g (1.14 lb)499 g / 506 g (1.10 lb)
 Stylus support (magnetic)Stylus support (magnetic charging)
Display
Resolution1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density)1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~213 ppi density)
Size11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio)10.95 inches, 341.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby VisionIPS LCD, 450 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 619
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14Android, Realme UI 3.0
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 UFS 3.1-
Main Camera
Dual5G model: 50 MP, 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens Wi-Fi model 13 MP, f/2.0, AF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesDual-LED flash, panorama, HDR-
Single-13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.08 MP, f/2.0, 105˚ (ultrawide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers)Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS - cellular model onlyGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, hotspot
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, compass
Battery
Charging67W wired, PD3.0, QC433W wired, PD 5W reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 8600 mAh8340 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, WhiteGlowing Gray, Glacier Blue, Green
ModelsM2105K81AC, M2105K81CRMP2107, RMP2108
PriceAbout 330 EURAbout 250 EUR
Tests
Display- Contrast ratio: 1664:1
Loudspeaker- -22.5 LUFS (Excellent)
Performance- AnTuTu: 395824 (v9) GeekBench: 2026 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro

  • Significantly faster performance
  • 67W fast charging
  • Premium build quality
  • Excellent display

  • Potentially higher price
  • Camera performance is average

Realme Pad X

  • Vibrant display
  • Reverse wired charging
  • More affordable
  • Good value for money

  • Slower performance
  • 33W charging is slower
  • Less premium build

Display Comparison

Both tablets feature excellent displays, but the Realme Pad X edges out slightly with a measured 496 nits brightness and a contrast ratio of 1664:1. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro's display is still very good, but the Realme Pad X's slightly higher brightness makes it a bit more enjoyable in bright environments. Both offer vibrant colors and sharp details.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality is generally not a priority for tablets, and both devices offer modest results. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro likely has a slightly better camera system, but neither tablet is going to replace your smartphone for photography. Expect decent quality for video calls and occasional snapshots.

Performance

This is where the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro truly shines. The Snapdragon 870 is a flagship-level chipset, providing significantly faster performance than the Realme Pad X's Snapdragon 695. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the Pad 5 Pro. The Realme Pad X is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro's 67W fast charging is a major advantage. It can charge from 0 to 100% in a fraction of the time compared to the Realme Pad X's 33W charging. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the faster charging speeds give the Pad 5 Pro a clear edge.

Buying Guide

Who should buy the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro? Power users, gamers, and those needing a tablet for productivity tasks will appreciate the Pad 5 Pro's performance. Who should buy the Realme Pad X? Budget-conscious buyers seeking a good-looking display and decent performance for everyday use will find the Pad X a solid option.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro worth the extra money?
If performance is a priority, then yes. The Snapdragon 870 offers a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 695, making it ideal for gaming and demanding apps.
❓ Can the Realme Pad X handle everyday tasks?
Yes, the Realme Pad X is perfectly capable of handling everyday tasks like browsing the web, checking email, and streaming videos. However, it may struggle with more intensive applications.