Xiaomi Mix Flip vs Google Pixel Fold: Which Foldable Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Mix Flip is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 and slower charging. However, the Pixel Fold’s software experience and unique design may appeal to those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mix Flip | Google Pixel Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 19 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 19 | Available. Released 2023, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded), glass back, aluminum frame, hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 167.5 x 74 x 7.6 mmFolded: 74 x 74 x 16 mm | Unfolded: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mmFolded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 192 g (6.70 oz) | 283 g (9.98 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1224 x 2912 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1840 x 2208 pixels (~378 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.86 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 183.3 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| - | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.8 inches, 1080 x 2092 pixels, 17.4:9 ratio, 408 ppi 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF (9cm - ∞), 2x optical zoom | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Leica lenses | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, Dolby Vision HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dolby Vision HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 0.7µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 9.5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired | Wired, PD3.0 Wireless |
| Type | 4780 mAh | Li-Po 4821 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Porcelain, Obsidian |
| Models | 2405CPX3DC, 2405CPX3DG | G9FPL |
| Price | € 1,463.14 / $ 999.99 / £ 579.00 | € 670.87 / $ 389.26 / £ 899.99 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Mix Flip
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Faster 67W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel Fold
- Foldable design may be less durable than Pixel Fold
Google Pixel Fold
- Polished Google software experience
- Unique wider unfolded display
- Strong integration with Google services
- Less powerful Tensor G2 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mix Flip boasts a measured peak brightness of 1314 nits, suggesting excellent outdoor visibility compared to the Pixel Fold (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower on Tensor-powered devices). While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the Mix Flip’s brightness advantage is significant. The absence of detailed panel specifications (LTPO, refresh rate) for both devices makes a deeper comparison difficult, but the Mix Flip’s higher peak brightness is a concrete advantage for users in bright environments. The Pixel Fold’s wider aspect ratio when unfolded may be preferable for multitasking and media consumption, but this comes at the cost of a less pocketable form factor when folded.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given Google’s computational photography prowess, the Pixel Fold likely prioritizes image processing and software enhancements. The Mix Flip, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP, will likely offer faster image capture and potentially better video recording capabilities. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures prevents a definitive judgment, but the Snapdragon’s ISP generally provides more flexibility for advanced camera features. We can assume both phones will offer competent camera systems, but the Pixel Fold will likely lean towards a more ‘Google’ aesthetic in image processing.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mix Flip’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset represents a substantial leap in performance over the Google Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s octa-core configuration – featuring a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.3 GHz – is designed for sustained peak performance, while the Tensor G2’s older Cortex-X1 cores (2.85 GHz) are optimized for AI tasks rather than raw speed. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 also offers superior thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. This translates to a smoother experience for demanding applications and a longer lifespan for the device. The Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 excels in machine learning tasks, but the Mix Flip dominates in CPU and GPU-intensive workloads.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mix Flip delivers a solid 11:58 hours of active use, a strong indicator of battery efficiency. While the Pixel Fold’s battery capacity is unknown, its Tensor G2 chipset is less power-efficient than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The Mix Flip’s 67W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for rapid top-ups compared to the Pixel Fold’s unspecified wired and wireless charging capabilities. This faster charging speed mitigates any potential concerns about battery life, providing users with more flexibility and reducing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mix Flip if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value fast charging to minimize downtime. Buy the Google Pixel Fold if you prioritize a polished software experience, seamless integration with Google services, and a wider, more tablet-like unfolded display, even if it means sacrificing some raw power and charging speed.