Xiaomi Mix 4 vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Clash of Charging Speed and AI Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed and convenience, the Xiaomi Mix 4 is the clear winner. Its 120W charging is unmatched, replenishing the battery in just 15 minutes. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip and superior camera processing offer a compelling alternative for those valuing AI-driven features and photographic quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mix 4 | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 10 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.6 x 75.4 x 8 mm (6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm, under display | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm, under display | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 15 min 50W wireless, 100% in 28 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Shadow Gray | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | 2106118C | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 660 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mix 4
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 888+ processor
- Under-display camera maximizes screen space
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
- Camera performance may lag behind Pixel 6 Pro
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Google Tensor chip with AI-powered features
- Exceptional camera performance and image processing
- Clean and intuitive Android software experience
- Significantly slower 23W charging
- Potentially lower raw processing power compared to Snapdragon
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Mix 4’s peak brightness isn’t specified, Xiaomi typically delivers competitive displays. Both feature high contrast ratios, with the Pixel 6 Pro claiming an 'infinite' (nominal) ratio. The Mix 4’s under-display camera is a unique feature, maximizing screen real estate, but potentially impacting front camera quality. The Pixel 6 Pro’s curved display edges contribute to a more immersive viewing experience, though some users may prefer the Mix 4’s potentially flatter panel.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is heavily reliant on Google’s computational photography, leveraging the Tensor chip’s AI capabilities. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel 6 Pro excels in dynamic range and image clarity, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Mix 4’s camera specs are not provided, but Xiaomi flagships typically feature high-resolution sensors and advanced features. The Tensor chip’s image processing pipeline offers features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode, unavailable on the Mix 4. The Pixel 6 Pro’s focus on software optimization gives it an edge in overall image quality.
Performance
Both phones utilize 5nm fabrication processes, but differ in their chipsets. The Xiaomi Mix 4 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G, with a prime core clocked at 2.99 GHz (Cortex-X1). The Google Pixel 6 Pro is powered by Google’s in-house Tensor chip, featuring a similar Cortex-X1 configuration at 2.80 GHz. While clock speeds are comparable, the Tensor chip’s strength lies in its dedicated AI processing units, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. Both utilize an octa-core configuration with similar mid and low-power cores (A78 and A55). The Mix 4’s Snapdragon 888+ is known for its raw processing power, while the Tensor prioritizes machine learning tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Mix 4). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Xiaomi Mix 4 supports a staggering 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 15 minutes. It also offers 50W wireless charging, reaching 100% in 28 minutes. The Pixel 6 Pro, in contrast, is limited to 23W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Mix 4’s charging speed is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mix 4 if you need the absolute fastest charging available, a powerful processor for demanding tasks, and don't mind a less refined software experience. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a clean Android experience, exceptional camera capabilities powered by Google’s Tensor chip, and a focus on intelligent features like Magic Eraser.