Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more modern chipset. While the Mi Mix 3 5G boasts a flagship Snapdragon 855, the Edge 30 Neo offers a better balance of features and value for today's user.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 78 NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), ceramic back, aluminum frame (7000 series) | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 157.9 x 74.7 x 9.4 mm (6.22 x 2.94 x 0.37 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), MIUI 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP (wide), f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 4-axis OIS 12 MP (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | Manual pop-up 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm Manual pop-up 2 MP, depth sensor | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3800 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sapphire Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | M1810E5GG | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| SAR | 1.56 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Unique sliding camera design
- Relatively affordable
- Older design
- Slower charging
- Less efficient processor
- Lower display brightness
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Fast 68W wired charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- Excellent battery life
- Less powerful processor than Mi Mix 3 5G (in raw numbers)
- Design is less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo takes a clear lead here. Its 1004 nits max brightness is significantly higher than the Mi Mix 3 5G, offering better visibility in sunlight. The Edge 30 Neo's 'infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests excellent image quality. The Mi Mix 3 5G's display is decent but lacks the Edge 30 Neo's punch.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The Edge 30 Neo likely has a more modern image processing pipeline, potentially resulting in better low-light performance and more accurate colors. The Mi Mix 3 5G's sliding camera design is unique, but doesn't necessarily translate to superior image quality. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G initially had an edge with the Snapdragon 855, a flagship chipset. However, the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Edge 30 Neo, while not as powerful on paper, is built on a more efficient 6nm process, resulting in better power efficiency and comparable real-world performance for everyday tasks. Gaming performance will be slightly better on the Mi Mix 3 5G, but the difference is not substantial.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo absolutely dominates in this category. Its endurance rating of 104h is exceptional. The Mi Mix 3 5G's battery life is respectable, but falls far short of the Edge 30 Neo. Furthermore, the Edge 30 Neo's 68W wired charging and 5W wireless charging are a massive advantage over the Mi Mix 3 5G's 18W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G is a good choice for those seeking a powerful processor on a budget and appreciate a sliding camera design. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more contemporary Android experience.