Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S vs Pocophone F1: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Pocophone F1 emerges as the clear winner for most users, boasting significantly longer battery life and a brighter display. While the Mi Mix 2S offers a more premium design and potentially slightly better camera processing, the F1's unbeatable value and endurance make it the more appealing choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | Xiaomi Pocophone F1 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat18 1200/100 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, March. Released 2018, April | 2018, August 22. Released 2018, August 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 150.9 x 74.9 x 8.1 mm (5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 155.5 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2246 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.99 inches, 92.6 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.18 inches, 96.2 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 4-axis OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, AF, 2x optical zoom | 12 MP, f/1.9, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@240fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.4µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 7.5W wireless (Qi) | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3400 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Graphite Black, Steel Blue, Rosso Red, Armored Edition with Kevlar |
| Models | M1803D5XA | M1805E10A, POCO F1 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| SAR | 0.54 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) | 0.66 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB | Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 59h | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1468:1 (nominal), 3.059 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 68dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 81dB | Voice 72dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 86dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 270814 (v7) GeekBench: 9158 (v4.4) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 265314 (v7) GeekBench: 9003 (v4.4) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
- Premium design with ceramic body
- In-display fingerprint sensor
- Slightly better camera processing
- More compact size
- Shorter battery life
- Higher price
- No headphone jack
- Thermal throttling under heavy load
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
- Exceptional value for money
- Longer battery life
- Bright and sunlight-readable display
- Aggressive cooling system
- Headphone jack
- Less premium design (plastic build)
- Camera can sometimes produce oversaturated images
- No in-display fingerprint sensor
Display Comparison
The Pocophone F1 takes the display crown with a significantly higher sunlight readability score (3.059 vs 2.1 for the Mi Mix 2S - estimated). Both offer a 6.18-inch LCD panel with Full HD+ resolution, but the F1's contrast ratio (1468:1) is notably better, resulting in richer colors and deeper blacks. The Mi Mix 2S has a slightly smaller chin, contributing to a more immersive feel.
Camera Comparison
The Mi Mix 2S generally produces slightly more pleasing images with better dynamic range and color accuracy, thanks to Xiaomi's image processing algorithms. The Pocophone F1's camera is still very capable, but can sometimes produce slightly oversaturated images. Both offer decent video recording capabilities.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 845 chipset and Octa-core CPU, ensuring flagship-level performance. However, the Pocophone F1's aggressive cooling system allows it to sustain peak performance for longer periods, especially during demanding tasks like gaming. The Mi Mix 2S might experience slight thermal throttling under prolonged heavy load.
Battery Life
This is where the Pocophone F1 truly shines. Its endurance rating of 94h significantly surpasses the Mi Mix 2S's 59h. This translates to noticeably longer battery life for the F1, easily lasting a full day of heavy use and potentially extending into a second day.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is ideal for users prioritizing a premium design, in-display fingerprint sensor, and a slightly more refined camera experience. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is perfect for those seeking maximum battery life, exceptional performance for the price, and a bright, sunlight-readable display.