Xiaomi has consistently delivered impressive value in the smartphone market. The Mi Max 3 and Redmi Note 3 are two popular contenders, each offering a unique blend of features and affordability. But which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 edges out the Redmi Note 3 thanks to its significantly better battery life, superior sunlight display visibility, and faster charging. While the Redmi Note 3 offers a solid experience, the Mi Max 3's enhancements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 - Special edition (Taiwan) |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2018, July. Released 2018, July | 2016, January 14. Released 2016, March 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 87.4 x 8 mm (6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 in) | 150 x 76 x 8.7 mm (5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 164 g (5.78 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | To be confirmed | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~350 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 122.9 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 82.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Hexa-core (4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A72) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8956 Snapdragon 650 |
| GPU | Adreno 509 | Adreno 510 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), upgradable to 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), MIUI 9.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM (Standard version), 32GB 3GB RAM (High/Special version) |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.9, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 720p/1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4050 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Champagne Gold, Blue | Silver, Gray, Gold |
| Models | M1804E4A | 2015116, 2015161 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 1.58 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) | 0.49 W/kg (head) 0.50 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -94.0dB |
Noise -96.0dB / Crosstalk -95.6dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 115h
| Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1462 (nominal), 3.061 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: 953:1 (nominal), 2.249 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 68dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 83dB
|
Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 119229 (v7)
GeekBench: 4907 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 1426Basemark X: 14717 |
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
- Exceptional battery life
- Excellent sunlight display visibility
- Faster charging (QC3)
- Slightly better performance
- Larger size may not be for everyone
- Design is somewhat dated
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
- Compact and comfortable to hold
- Reliable Snapdragon 650 chipset
- Affordable price
- Shorter battery life
- Lower display contrast
- Slower charging (10W)
Display Comparison
The Mi Max 3 boasts a significantly higher contrast ratio (1462:1 nominal, 3061:1 sunlight) compared to the Redmi Note 3 (953:1 nominal, 2249:1 sunlight). This translates to noticeably better image quality, deeper blacks, and improved visibility under direct sunlight – a major advantage for outdoor use. Both phones likely feature similar LCD panel technology, but the Mi Max 3's implementation is clearly superior.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively assess without detailed testing. Both phones feature standard camera setups for their respective price points. The Mi Max 3 likely benefits from newer image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in slightly better image quality in certain conditions. Both phones will likely struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The Mi Max 3's Snapdragon 636 offers a slight performance edge over the Redmi Note 3's Snapdragon 650. While both chipsets are capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming, the 636's newer architecture and slightly higher clock speeds provide a smoother experience. However, the Redmi Note 3's Snapdragon 650 is known for its stability and efficiency.
Battery Life
This is where the Mi Max 3 truly shines. With an endurance rating of 115 hours, it significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3's 93 hours. This translates to considerably longer battery life, allowing users to go days without needing to recharge.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life, excellent outdoor visibility, and faster charging. The Redmi Note 3 is a good option for those seeking a reliable and affordable phone with a slightly more compact design and a proven Snapdragon 650 chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mi Max 3 worth the extra cost over the Redmi Note 3?
If battery life and display visibility are important to you, then yes. The Mi Max 3 offers a significant upgrade in these areas.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Mi Max 3 has a slight edge due to its newer chipset, but both phones can handle most games at moderate settings.