The Xiaomi Mi CC9e and Redmi Note 8 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The CC9e prioritized a sleek design and efficient processor, while the Note 8 Pro aimed for gaming prowess with a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right Xiaomi for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around usability and a smoother experience, the Redmi Note 8 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Helio G90T chipset delivers noticeably superior performance, particularly in gaming, offsetting the similar battery endurance and charging speeds. However, the CC9e remains a viable option for those seeking a more compact form factor and efficient power consumption.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (2CA) 450/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2019, August 29. Released 2019, September 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm (6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) | 161.4 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173.8 g (6.14 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~286 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.01 inches, 88.7 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD, HDR, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CC Helio G90T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), MIUI 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4030 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Red, Blue, White, Deep Sea Blue, Midnight Blue, Electric Blue, Twilight Orange |
| Models | - | 2015105, M1906G7I, M1906G7G |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.47 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -91.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1326:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 64dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 224759 (v7), 279355 (v8)
GeekBench: 6999 (v4.4), 1622 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- More compact and lightweight design.
- Potentially better power efficiency for basic tasks.
- Slightly lower price point (likely).
- Significantly weaker CPU and GPU performance.
- Less capable camera system (likely).
- Lower display brightness.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
- Superior gaming performance thanks to the Helio G90T.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Likely more advanced camera features.
- Larger and heavier form factor.
- Potentially slightly lower battery efficiency.
- May run warmer under sustained load.
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar contrast ratios at 1326:1, indicating comparable color reproduction. However, the Redmi Note 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 640 nits compared to an unspecified value for the CC9e. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Note 8 Pro’s brightness advantage makes it the superior choice for media consumption in varied lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the Redmi Note 8 Pro’s market positioning suggests a more robust camera system. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, the Note 8 Pro likely benefits from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP) optimizations geared towards photography. The CC9e, while capable, likely prioritizes efficiency over advanced camera features. The presence of a 64MP main sensor (a common feature in the Note 8 Pro line) would give it a clear advantage in detail capture, though software processing plays a crucial role.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 8 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G90T (12nm) utilizes a more modern architecture – Cortex-A76 cores – compared to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm) in the CC9e, which relies on older Cortex-A55 cores. The G90T’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores provide a substantial performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural advantage of the G90T is significant. The 12nm process node of the G90T, while slightly larger than the 11nm of the SD665, is offset by its more efficient core design, resulting in comparable, and often superior, real-world performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the differing chipsets. This indicates that the Snapdragon 665’s efficiency largely compensates for the Helio G90T’s higher power draw. Both support 18W wired charging, meaning 0-100% charge times will be comparable, likely around 2-2.5 hours. The similar endurance ratings suggest that battery life won’t be a deciding factor for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi CC9e if you need a more compact and lightweight phone for everyday tasks, prioritizing efficiency and a less demanding user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro if you prefer a larger display, demand better gaming performance, and are willing to trade some efficiency for raw power. The Note 8 Pro is the clear choice for mobile gamers and multimedia enthusiasts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G90T in the Redmi Note 8 Pro suffer from overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Helio G90T is a powerful chip, it can generate significant heat under sustained load. Xiaomi implemented thermal management solutions, but some users have reported throttling during extended gaming. However, the Note 8 Pro’s larger size allows for better heat dissipation compared to the more compact CC9e.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 665 in the Mi CC9e sufficient for playing popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It’s not ideal for demanding games, and you may experience stuttering or lag during intense moments. The Redmi Note 8 Pro offers a significantly better gaming experience.
❓ What type of storage and RAM do these phones use, and does it impact performance?
While not specified in the provided data, both phones likely utilize UFS 2.1 storage and LPDDR4X RAM, common for this price segment. Faster storage (UFS 3.0 or 3.1) and RAM (LPDDR5) would improve app loading times and multitasking, but are unlikely to be found in these models.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Mi CC9e and Redmi Note 8 Pro?
Both phones likely ran MIUI based on Android, but the CC9e was targeted towards a younger audience with a focus on aesthetics and selfie features. The Note 8 Pro’s software experience was more general-purpose, with a greater emphasis on gaming-related features and customization options.
