The Xiaomi Mi CC9e and Realme X2 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The CC9e prioritized affordability and a streamlined experience, while the X2 Pro aimed for near-flagship performance at a competitive price. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on the impact of their contrasting chipsets and charging capabilities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing everyday tasks and battery life, the Realme X2 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ chipset delivers significantly faster performance, and its 50W SuperVOOC charging drastically reduces downtime. While the CC9e offers value, the X2 Pro provides a superior overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (2CA) 450/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2019, October 15. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm (6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173.8 g (6.14 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~286 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.01 inches, 88.7 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), MIUI 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | 64GB UFS 2.1, 128/256GB UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.5, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with Dolby Atmos stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio (incl. speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 50W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4030 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Lunar White, Neptune Blue, Red Master Edition, Gray Master Edition |
| Models | - | RMX1931 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -91.3dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 94h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 82dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 91dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 396827 (v7), 467653 (v8)
GeekBench: 10373 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- More affordable price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely inferior camera quality
Realme X2 Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 855+
- Ultra-fast 50W SuperVOOC charging
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price compared to the CC9e
- Potentially larger physical size
- May experience more heat under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting they utilize AMOLED panels, but specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The Realme X2 Pro, being positioned as a more premium device, likely benefits from a higher peak brightness for improved outdoor visibility. The CC9e, focusing on cost savings, may have a slightly less vibrant display. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X2 Pro's positioning suggests a superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Given the X2 Pro’s higher price point and focus on features, it likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). Larger sensors capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. While the CC9e may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the X2 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality across a wider range of scenarios. The absence of details on lens apertures further complicates a direct comparison, but the X2 Pro’s overall hardware suggests a more capable camera.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X2 Pro’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Xiaomi Mi CC9e’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 855+ features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, alongside three additional Kryo 485 cores at 2.42 GHz, and four efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz, offering significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the X2 Pro. The CC9e’s Snapdragon 665 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or demanding applications.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both devices achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are dramatically different. The Realme X2 Pro boasts 50W SuperVOOC charging, capable of fully charging the battery in just 35 minutes. The Xiaomi Mi CC9e is limited to 18W wired charging, requiring significantly longer to reach a full charge. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the X2 Pro, minimizing downtime and providing a more convenient user experience. The equal endurance rating suggests the X2 Pro’s more powerful chipset is offset by a slightly smaller battery, but the charging speed advantage is undeniable.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi CC9e if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and aren't concerned with demanding gaming or intensive multitasking. Buy the Realme X2 Pro if you prioritize performance for gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value incredibly fast charging speeds to minimize interruptions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 665 in the Mi CC9e struggle with modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 665 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to deliver a smooth gaming experience in demanding titles like PUBG or Call of Duty, even at lower graphics settings. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential lag. The X2 Pro’s Snapdragon 855+ is far better suited for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme X2 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the Mi CC9e in real-world usage?
The 50W charging on the X2 Pro is dramatically faster. While exact times depend on battery level, the X2 Pro can go from 0% to 100% in approximately 35 minutes. The Mi CC9e’s 18W charging will likely take over 2 hours to achieve a full charge, making the X2 Pro significantly more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the camera on the Realme X2 Pro capable of recording 4K video at 60fps?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, the Snapdragon 855+ chipset is fully capable of recording 4K video at 60fps. Given the X2 Pro’s positioning as a performance-focused device, it is highly probable that it supports this feature. The CC9e’s Snapdragon 665 is unlikely to support 4K/60fps recording.
