The Xiaomi Mi CC9 and Mi 9T Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The CC9 prioritizes a sleek design and affordability, while the 9T Pro aims for near-flagship performance at a competitive price. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the CC9 offers a more affordable entry point, the 9T Pro’s performance uplift justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2019, August 21. Released 2019, August 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 74.5 x 8.7 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, HDR |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 27W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4030 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Carbon black, Red flame, Glacier blue |
| Models | - | M1903F11G |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.51 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 368846 (v7), 437823 (v8)
GeekBench: 10684 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi CC9
- More affordable price point
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Snapdragon 710 is less powerful than the 855
- Slower 18W charging
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 855 performance
- Faster 27W charging with QC4
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Higher price compared to the Mi CC9
- Potentially slightly larger and heavier
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Mi 9T Pro’s positioning, it likely benefits from a slightly more refined panel. The identical contrast ratio suggests similar black levels and vibrant colors on both devices, but the 9T Pro’s higher processing power could translate to smoother animations and potentially better HDR support.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Mi 9T Pro, being the higher-tier device, likely features a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. While both phones likely offer similar software features, the 855’s image signal processor (ISP) in the 9T Pro will process images faster and with greater detail. The CC9’s camera is likely adequate for everyday use, but the 9T Pro will excel in low-light conditions and offer more flexibility for advanced photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Mi 9T Pro’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Mi CC9’s Snapdragon 710 (10nm). The 855 features a Kryo 485 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the 710’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold core. This translates to a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 7nm process node of the 855 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged use. The 9T Pro’s Adreno 640 GPU further solidifies its gaming advantage over the 710’s Adreno 615.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the 9T Pro’s more powerful chipset. This is likely due to optimizations in software and power management. However, the Mi 9T Pro’s 27W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) is a significant advantage over the CC9’s 18W charging. The 9T Pro can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. A full charge from 0-100% will be noticeably quicker on the 9T Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi CC9 if you prioritize a lower price and are a casual smartphone user who primarily browses the web, uses social media, and takes occasional photos. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro if you are a gamer, a power user who frequently multitasks, or someone who wants a phone that will remain responsive for years to come. The 9T Pro’s superior processing power and faster charging are worth the investment for those demanding more from their device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mi 9T Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 855 in the Mi 9T Pro, coupled with its 7nm process node, is more thermally efficient than the Snapdragon 710. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the 9T Pro is less prone to significant throttling compared to the CC9, allowing for longer, more consistent performance.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 710 and 855 noticeable in everyday use?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference may not be immediately apparent. However, when opening multiple apps, editing photos/videos, or playing demanding games, the Snapdragon 855 in the Mi 9T Pro will provide a significantly smoother and more responsive experience.
❓ Does the Mi 9T Pro support higher refresh rate displays?
While the provided specifications don't explicitly mention a high refresh rate display, the Mi 9T Pro's processing power could potentially handle higher refresh rates if supported by the panel. However, without official confirmation, it's safe to assume both devices operate at a standard 60Hz refresh rate.
