Xiaomi Mi CC9 vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: A Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ offers a substantial leap in processing power and gaming capabilities compared to the Mi CC9’s Snapdragon 710. However, the Mi CC9 remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and a lighter form factor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi CC9 | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 74.5 x 8.7 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR, 430 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4030 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Papaya Orange |
| Models | - | HD1925 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 800 EUR |
Xiaomi Mi CC9
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life with light usage
- Compact and lightweight design (likely)
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Less capable camera system
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 855+
- Faster 30W Warp Charge
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed data speeds
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Larger and heavier design (likely)
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand history), the specifics are not provided. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, with its superior chipset, can leverage a higher refresh rate display (90Hz was standard for the 7T Pro line) for smoother visuals, a feature the Mi CC9 likely lacks. The 7nm process of the Snapdragon 855+ also contributes to more efficient display power consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is limited. However, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, being a flagship device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The Mi CC9’s focus on selfies suggests a strong front-facing camera, but the rear camera system is likely less capable than the OnePlus. The 855+’s image signal processor (ISP) also contributes to faster and more accurate image processing on the OnePlus.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Xiaomi Mi CC9’s Snapdragon 710 (10nm). The 855+ features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the 710’s Kryo 360 Gold core at 2.2 GHz. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience. The 7nm process also means better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Users who play graphically intensive games or edit videos will see a dramatic improvement with the OnePlus.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi CC9’s 18W charging is considerably slower than the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 30W Warp Charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging on the OnePlus allows for quicker top-ups, mitigating any potential capacity disadvantage. The more efficient Snapdragon 855+ also contributes to better battery life under heavy load, despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity than the Mi CC9.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi CC9 if you need a capable daily driver with decent battery life and a focus on selfie photography, all at a significantly lower price point. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand the absolute highest performance. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and 5G connectivity, and are willing to pay a premium for a flagship-level experience. This is the phone for power users and mobile gamers.