Xiaomi consistently delivers impressive smartphones, and the Mi 9 Pro and Poco F3 GT are prime examples. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different audiences. This comparison dives deep into their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F3 GT emerges as the winner for most users thanks to its significantly faster charging, modern chipset, and aggressive pricing. However, the Mi 9 Pro retains appeal with its premium build and potentially slightly better camera performance, though it's showing its age.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 41 - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame (7000 series) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 157.2 x 74.6 x 8.5 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm, PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, QC4
30W wireless
10W reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dream White, Titanium Black | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | - | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro
- Premium Build Quality
- Excellent Camera (especially telephoto)
- Vibrant AMOLED Display
- Wireless Charging
- Older Chipset
- Slower Charging
- Smaller Battery
- Higher Price (relative to F3 GT)
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Blazing-Fast 67W Charging
- Powerful Dimensity 1200 Chipset
- 120Hz Refresh Rate Display
- Excellent Value
- Less Premium Build
- Camera Not as Versatile as Mi 9 Pro
- Macro Camera is largely useless
Display Comparison
The Mi 9 Pro boasts a 6.53-inch Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate and a punch-hole camera. The Poco F3 GT features a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a punch-hole camera. While both offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling, the F3 GT's higher refresh rate provides a slightly more responsive feel. The F3 GT also tends to be brighter.
Camera Comparison
The Mi 9 Pro features a triple-camera system (108MP main, 20MP ultrawide, 12MP telephoto) and generally produces excellent images with good dynamic range. The Poco F3 GT has a triple-camera system (64MP main, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro). While the F3 GT's camera is capable, the Mi 9 Pro's higher resolution main sensor and more versatile telephoto lens give it a slight edge in overall image quality, especially in low light.
Performance
The Poco F3 GT's MediaTek Dimensity 1200 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Mi 9 Pro's Snapdragon 855+. The Dimensity 1200 excels in gaming and demanding tasks, while the 855+ is still capable but shows its age. The F3 GT's newer architecture also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT's 5000mAh battery and 67W fast charging are a major highlight. It can charge from 0% to 100% in around 42 minutes. The Mi 9 Pro has a 4000mAh battery with 40W wired and 30W wireless charging, offering decent battery life but significantly slower charging speeds.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a premium feel, a slightly more refined camera experience, and don't mind an older chipset. The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT is perfect for gamers, power users, and those seeking exceptional value with blazing-fast charging and a modern processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mi 9 Pro still a good phone in 2024?
It's a capable phone, especially if you value a premium feel and good camera. However, the older chipset and slower charging are drawbacks compared to newer devices.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F3 GT is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset and higher refresh rate display.
