Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: A Deep Dive into 855+ Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing versatile charging options and potentially longer battery life due to wireless charging, the Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro emerges as the winner. While the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren offers a streamlined experience, the Mi 9 Pro’s 40W wired, 30W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless charging capabilities provide a significant advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame (7000 series) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.2 x 74.6 x 8.5 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, QC4 30W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dream White, Titanium Black | Papaya Orange |
| Models | - | HD1925 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 800 EUR |
Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro
- Superior charging speeds (40W wired)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially larger battery capacity
- Software experience may be less refined than OnePlus
- 5G connectivity not standard
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially smoother display (90Hz)
- Clean and optimized software experience
- Slower wired charging (30W)
- No wireless or reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature AMOLED panels, common for flagships of this era. However, specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are not provided. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s display was known for its 90Hz refresh rate, a feature not explicitly mentioned for the Mi 9 Pro, suggesting a potential advantage in smoothness for the OnePlus device. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting the design trends of 2019.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will depend on sensor size, lens aperture, and image processing algorithms. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone boasts a groundbreaking camera system compared to contemporaries. Focusing on the main sensor and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) would be key differentiators, but this information is unavailable.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ (7nm), offering comparable raw processing power. The CPU configuration is nearly identical – an octa-core setup with 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485, and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485 cores. The slight difference in the fourth core clock speed (1.8 GHz on the Mi 9 Pro vs 1.78 GHz on the OnePlus) is unlikely to translate to a noticeable real-world performance difference. Thermal management will be crucial; the 7nm process helps, but sustained loads could lead to throttling. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren benefits from 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the standard Mi 9 Pro, offering faster data speeds where available.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro’s charging capabilities are its standout feature. 40W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) is significantly faster than the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 30W wired charging. Furthermore, the Mi 9 Pro adds 30W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, allowing it to charge other devices. While the Mi 9 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the inclusion of wireless charging suggests a larger battery to accommodate the power draw. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren relies solely on wired charging, making the Mi 9 Pro the clear winner for charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro if you need maximum charging flexibility, including wireless and reverse wireless charging, and appreciate a larger battery capacity. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prioritize a cleaner software experience and a slightly more refined, focused feature set, and don't heavily rely on wireless charging.