Xiaomi Mi 11X vs Realme GT 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value

The Xiaomi Mi 11X and Realme GT 5G represent a fascinating crossroads in the smartphone market. The Mi 11X, powered by the Snapdragon 870, offered a compelling flagship experience at a more accessible price point. The Realme GT 5G, with the more powerful Snapdragon 888, aimed for outright performance. Now, with price drops, the lines have blurred, making a direct comparison crucial for potential buyers.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficient charging, the Realme GT 5G emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 888, despite potential thermal concerns, delivers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 65W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Mi 11X remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Mi 11X Realme GT 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands77, 78 Sub61, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2021, April 232021, March 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, April 27Available. Released 2021, March 10
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5)Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame
Dimensions163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in)158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (Glass) / 9.1 mm (Leather)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight196 g (6.91 oz)186 g (6.56 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5-
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 660
OSAndroid 11, MIUI 12Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm-
Triple48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro)64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging33W wired, PD3.0, QC3 100% in 52 min65W wired, 100% in 35 min
TypeLi-Po 4520 mAh4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsCelestial Silver, Lunar White, Cosmic BlackGold/Black, Blue, Silver
ModelsM2012K11AIRMX2202
PriceAbout 330 EURAbout 330 EUR
SAR0.86 W/kg (head)     0.69 W/kg (body)-
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 98h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -24.5 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 703986 (v8), 810433 (v9) GeekBench: 3555 (v5.1) GFXBench: 55fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Mi 11X

  • More efficient Snapdragon 870 processor
  • Compact and manageable size
  • Potentially lower price point

  • Slower charging speed (33W)
  • Less powerful processor compared to the 888
  • Limited camera details available

Realme GT 5G

  • Faster Snapdragon 888 processor
  • Significantly faster 65W charging
  • Higher display brightness

  • Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
  • May be more expensive
  • Larger size may not suit all users

Display Comparison

Both devices feature displays suitable for media consumption, but the Realme GT 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 650 nits, offering a more vibrant experience in direct sunlight. While both have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the Mi 11X’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. The Realme GT 5G’s higher brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor visibility.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. However, the Realme GT 5G, being positioned as a more premium device, likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. The absence of details on the Mi 11X’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond basic smartphone photography.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT 5G’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) is architecturally superior to the Mi 11X’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 888 features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering a significant performance boost over the 870’s Kryo 585 prime core at 3.2 GHz. However, the 5nm process of the 888 contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Mi 11X’s 870 excels in sustained performance due to its lower peak power draw, while the 888 provides bursts of higher performance. Both utilize Octa-core CPUs, but the 888’s architecture is more modern.

Battery Life

Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 98 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Realme GT 5G’s 65W charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. The Mi 11X’s 33W charging takes 52 minutes, a noticeable difference for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the GT 5G effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11X if you need a compact, well-rounded flagship experience that prioritizes efficiency and consistent performance over raw power, and if you're looking to save money. Buy the Realme GT 5G if you prefer maximum performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and if you value incredibly fast charging speeds, even if it means potentially experiencing some thermal throttling under heavy load.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in the Realme GT 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat than the 870. While the Realme GT 5G incorporates cooling solutions, extended gaming at maximum settings can lead to thermal throttling, reducing sustained performance. However, the throttling is generally manageable and doesn't render the phone unusable.
❓ How does the 33W charging on the Mi 11X compare to the 65W charging on the GT 5G in real-world usage?
The 65W charging on the Realme GT 5G is significantly faster, taking approximately 35 minutes for a full charge. The Mi 11X’s 33W charging takes around 52 minutes. This difference is noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery, offering a substantial convenience advantage to the GT 5G.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture between the Snapdragon 870 and 888 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference between the two processors is minimal. Both chips provide a smooth and responsive experience. The benefits of the Snapdragon 888 become more apparent in demanding applications like gaming, video editing, and running multiple apps simultaneously.