The Xiaomi Mi 11X, released with a focus on flagship-level performance at a competitive price, now faces a newer contender: the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. While the Edge 30 Neo doesn't aim for the same raw power, it introduces significantly faster charging and a more modern design. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and sustained performance, the Xiaomi Mi 11X is the clear winner, thanks to its Snapdragon 870. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo appeals to those who value rapid 68W charging and a brighter display, making it a strong contender for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 23 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 27 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3 100% in 52 min | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Celestial Silver, Lunar White, Cosmic Black | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | M2012K11AI | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.69 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi 11X
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 870
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Potentially more capable camera system
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- 5W wireless charging support
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 processor
- Potentially lower performance in demanding games
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to the Mi 11X’s unspecified peak brightness. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight for the Edge 30 Neo. While the Mi 11X’s display quality is likely good, the Edge 30 Neo’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The Edge 30 Neo’s panel size is also likely smaller, contributing to a higher pixel density and potentially sharper image, though this isn't explicitly stated in the data.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the context data lacks specifics to make a definitive comparison. However, given the Mi 11X’s positioning as a performance-focused device, it likely features a more capable primary sensor and image processing pipeline. The Edge 30 Neo may focus on software enhancements and computational photography to compensate for a potentially less powerful sensor. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or dynamic range.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mi 11X’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) in CPU and GPU benchmarks. The 870’s octa-core configuration, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides a substantial advantage in demanding tasks. The 695, while efficient, is geared towards mid-range performance. The 7nm process node of the 870 also allows for better thermal management compared to the 6nm 695, meaning the Mi 11X is less likely to throttle under sustained load. Gamers and power users will find the Mi 11X a more responsive and capable device.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Mi 11X’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in a significantly shorter time than the Mi 11X’s 33W charging (52 minutes to 100%). The addition of 5W wireless charging on the Edge 30 Neo provides added convenience, a feature absent on the Mi 11X. The faster charging speed of the Edge 30 Neo mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11X if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications without throttling, and if you prioritize long-term performance over the latest charging technology. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a phone with a vibrant, bright display, incredibly fast charging, and a more compact form factor, even if it means sacrificing some processing horsepower.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Motorola Edge 30 Neo powerful enough for demanding mobile games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 can run Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Mi 11X’s Snapdragon 870 offers a significantly better gaming experience with higher and more stable frame rates at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 30 Neo compared to the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Mi 11X in real-world use?
The 68W charging on the Edge 30 Neo can top up the battery from 0% to 100% in approximately 40-45 minutes, while the Mi 11X takes around 52 minutes. This difference is noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly recharge their phones.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Mi 11X experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 in the Mi 11X is generally well-managed, but some throttling can occur during prolonged, intensive gaming. However, the 7nm process node helps mitigate this compared to older or less efficient chipsets.
❓ What type of display technology does the Motorola Edge 30 Neo use, and does it support high refresh rates?
The context data doesn't specify the display technology, but it's likely OLED given the infinite contrast ratio. While not explicitly stated, many phones in this class support 120Hz or 144Hz refresh rates for smoother scrolling and animations.
