The Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro and Realme GT Neo 3T are both compelling mid-range smartphones vying for your attention. Both offer impressive features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 3T takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging (80W vs 33W), excellent battery life, and competitive price. While the Mi 11X Pro boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the GT Neo 3T's overall package offers better value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 23 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 05 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Celestial Silver, Lunar White, Cosmic Black | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | M2012K11I | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.60 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 726007 (v9)
GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Snapdragon 888)
- Good camera performance
- Premium build quality
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Shorter battery life
- Potentially higher price
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Excellent battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Competitive price
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 870)
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, but the Realme GT Neo 3T shines with a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The contrast ratio is infinite (nominal) on the GT Neo 3T, indicating deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Mi 11X Pro's display is also great, but lacks the same brightness advantage.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable. Both phones offer capable main sensors and ultrawide lenses. The Mi 11X Pro might have a slight advantage in image processing due to Qualcomm's ISP, but the GT Neo 3T's camera is no slouch. Low-light performance is decent on both.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro holds a slight edge in performance thanks to the Snapdragon 888 chipset. While the Snapdragon 870 in the Realme GT Neo 3T is still incredibly capable, the 888 offers a bit more headroom for demanding tasks and future-proofing. However, real-world performance differences are often negligible for most users.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 3T dominates in this category. Its endurance rating of 118h is significantly higher than the Mi 11X Pro. Coupled with its 80W fast charging, it can be fully charged in around 35 minutes, while the Mi 11X Pro takes over 50 minutes with its 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power for demanding games or applications. The Realme GT Neo 3T is perfect for those who value fast charging, long battery life, and a vibrant display, all at a more accessible price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 888 overheating a concern on the Mi 11X Pro?
The Snapdragon 888 is known to run hot under sustained load. Xiaomi has implemented thermal management solutions, but it's still something to be aware of, especially during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 3T have 5G connectivity?
Yes, both the Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro and the Realme GT Neo 3T support 5G connectivity.
