Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Realme GT 8 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT 8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers significantly improved performance and efficiency, coupled with blazing-fast 120W charging. While the Mi 11 remains a capable device, the GT 8 Pro represents a substantial generational upgrade.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi 11 | Realme GT 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 28. Released 2021, January 01 | 2025, October 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, October 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.1 mm (Glass) / 8.6 mm (Leather) | 161.8 x 76.9 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China |
| Weight | 196 g (Glass) / 194 g (Leather) (6.84 oz) | 214 g or 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) | 1440 x 3136 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~508 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.79 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM), 7000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 840 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 7.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ricoh lens, Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, switchable camera bump |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 22mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.6, 65mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.64µm |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, Dolby Vision, 10-bit LOG |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR, Dolby Vision |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 50W wireless, 100% in 53 min 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, 120W UFCS, 14.4W PD, 55W PPS, 14.4W QC, 15 min to 50%, 43 min to 100% 50W wireless, 79 min to 100% 10W wireless reverse 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Horizon Blue, Cloud White, Midnight Gray, Special Edition Blue, Gold, Violet | Diary White, Urban Blue, Green, Aston Martin Green |
| Models | M2011K2C, M2011K2G | RMX5210 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 899.99 |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 89h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 668722 (v8) GeekBench: 3489 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 60:32h endurance, 1100 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class D (60 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Xiaomi Mi 11
- Proven software ecosystem and support
- Excellent display quality
- Capable camera system
- Slower charging speeds
- Older chipset with potential throttling issues
- Less efficient processor
Realme GT 8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- More efficient 3nm process
- Newer brand with potentially less established support
- Battery endurance slightly lower than Mi 11 (though offset by charging)
- Camera details lacking in context data
Display Comparison
The Realme GT 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 2262 nits, compared to the Xiaomi Mi 11’s ‘infinite’ (nominal) contrast ratio. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight for the GT 8 Pro. While the Mi 11’s display quality is excellent, the GT 8 Pro’s brightness is a tangible advantage. Both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology, but the GT 8 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a key differentiator for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but the context data lacks specifics for a detailed comparison. Assuming both utilize multi-camera setups (a common feature in this segment), the Realme GT 8 Pro likely benefits from the newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, potentially leading to improved image processing and low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the GT 8 Pro’s newer chipset provides a likely edge.
Performance
The Realme GT 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, built on a 3nm process, represents a major architectural shift from the Xiaomi Mi 11’s 5nm Snapdragon 888. The GT 8 Pro’s Oryon V3 Phoenix CPU cores (2x4.6 GHz + 6x3.62 GHz) offer a substantial clock speed advantage over the Mi 11’s (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This, combined with the more efficient 3nm node, results in significantly improved performance and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Mi 11’s Snapdragon 888 is still powerful, but the GT 8 Pro’s chipset is in a different league.
Battery Life
The Realme GT 8 Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature. Its 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 43 minutes, dramatically outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 11’s 55W wired charging (45 minutes to 100%). The GT 8 Pro also supports UFCS and PPS standards for wider compatibility. While the Mi 11 offers 50W wireless charging (53 minutes to 100%), the GT 8 Pro’s 50W wireless (79 minutes) is still competitive. The Mi 11’s 89-hour endurance rating is respectable, but the GT 8 Pro’s 60:32h endurance, coupled with its incredibly fast charging, provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 if you prioritize a well-established ecosystem, a proven track record of software support, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme GT 8 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance, fastest charging available, and are willing to embrace a newer, more aggressive brand. Gamers and power users will find the GT 8 Pro particularly appealing.