Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 offers a compelling package with its slightly superior battery endurance and faster wireless charging, especially given its often lower price point. While the Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a brighter display, the Mi 11’s overall value proposition is stronger.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi 11 | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 28. Released 2021, January 01 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.1 mm (Glass) / 8.6 mm (Leather) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 196 g (Glass) / 194 g (Leather) (6.84 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 50W wireless, 100% in 53 min 10W reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Horizon Blue, Cloud White, Midnight Gray, Special Edition Blue, Gold, Violet | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | M2011K2C, M2011K2G | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 89h | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 668722 (v8) GeekBench: 3489 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi 11
- Longer battery endurance (89h rating)
- Faster wireless charging (50W)
- Potentially better value for money
- Display brightness likely lower than Oppo
- Camera details are unknown
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Brighter display (774 nits)
- Faster initial wired charging (40% in 10 min)
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Shorter battery endurance (81h rating)
- Slower wireless charging (30W)
- Likely higher price
Display Comparison
Both the Xiaomi Mi 11 and Oppo Find X3 Pro feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Oppo Find X3 Pro distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, significantly exceeding what Xiaomi officially states for the Mi 11. This makes the Find X3 Pro more readable under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Find X3 Pro’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor users. The lack of refresh rate data prevents a full comparison of smoothness, but both are expected to offer a high refresh rate experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or features. This makes a direct comparison impossible. However, given Oppo’s historical focus on camera innovation, the Find X3 Pro likely employs more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a more sophisticated camera system overall. Without sensor details, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities. The absence of information on optical image stabilization (OIS) is also a significant omission.
Performance
Both devices are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. Performance differences will likely stem from thermal management and software optimization, areas not covered by the provided data. Both phones utilize fast LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 contributes to improved efficiency compared to previous generations, but sustained performance will still be impacted by heat.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 boasts an endurance rating of 89 hours, outperforming the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s 81 hours. This suggests the Mi 11 offers better real-world battery life despite having similar chipsets. The Mi 11 also offers more versatile charging options: 55W wired (45 min to 100%), 50W wireless (53 min to 100%), and 10W reverse wireless. The Find X3 Pro counters with 65W wired charging (40% in 10 min) and 30W wireless (80 min to 100%), alongside 10W reverse wireless. While the Find X3 Pro charges faster initially with its wired solution, the Mi 11’s wireless charging is significantly quicker, a key advantage for users who prefer cable-free power-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 if you prioritize maximizing battery life and fast wireless charging, and are looking for a flagship experience at a potentially lower cost. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand the brightest possible display for outdoor visibility and appreciate a potentially more refined software experience, and are willing to pay a premium.