Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is the clear winner, offering a brighter display, significantly improved performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, and a refined camera system. While the Mi 11 Ultra remains a capable device, the 13 Ultra's advancements make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra | Xiaomi 13 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 29 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, April 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 163.2 x 74.6 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 234 g (8.25 oz) | 227 g (8.01 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 or f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.0, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless, 100% in 49 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) | Black, Olive Green, White, Orange, Yellow, Blue |
| Models | M2102K1G, M2102K1C | 2304FPN6DC, 2304FPN6DG |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | € 797.98 / $ 389.69 |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 95h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Excellent camera system
- Bright and vibrant display
- Fast charging
- Premium design
- Older chipset
- Can get warm under load
- Software updates may be less frequent
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
- Significantly improved performance
- Brighter display
- Enhanced camera system with Leica tuning
- Faster charging
- Improved battery efficiency
- Higher price
- Potentially larger size/weight
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra's display shines brighter, literally. With a measured peak brightness of 1207 nits compared to the Mi 11 Ultra's 943 nits, the 13 Ultra offers better visibility in direct sunlight. Both have excellent contrast ratios (effectively infinite for the Mi 11 Ultra), but the 13 Ultra's higher refresh rate (likely 120Hz, though not explicitly stated) contributes to a smoother visual experience. The 13 Ultra also likely has improved color accuracy and calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera systems, but the 13 Ultra takes the lead. While the Mi 11 Ultra has a 108MP main sensor, the 13 Ultra's larger sensor, improved image processing algorithms, and likely enhanced lens optics deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The 13 Ultra also benefits from Leica tuning, resulting in a more refined and professional look to its photos. The 13 Ultra's zoom capabilities are also likely superior.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Xiaomi 13 Ultra provides a substantial performance boost over the Snapdragon 888 in the Mi 11 Ultra. The newer chipset's improved architecture and manufacturing process (4nm vs 5nm) result in faster processing speeds, better power efficiency, and enhanced graphics performance. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and improved gaming performance on the 13 Ultra.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra demonstrates improved battery efficiency. While the Mi 11 Ultra boasts an impressive endurance rating of 95h, the 13 Ultra achieves 108h. Active use scores also favor the 13 Ultra (10:09h vs unspecified for Mi 11 Ultra). The 13 Ultra's 90W wired charging is also faster than the Mi 11 Ultra's 67W, though both offer 67W wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a great option for budget-conscious buyers seeking a flagship experience with a fantastic camera. It's ideal for those who don't need the absolute latest technology. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is for photography enthusiasts and power users who demand the best possible performance, camera capabilities, and a premium experience, and are willing to pay a premium.