Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Power

Both the Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G and the Realme X50 Pro 5G represent compelling value in the 2020 flagship space, now available at significantly reduced prices. Both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G chipset, but diverge in key areas like charging speed and battery endurance, making the choice less straightforward than a simple spec sheet comparison suggests.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Realme X50 Pro 5G is the clear winner thanks to its 65W charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. However, the Mi 10T 5G remains a strong contender, offering a comparable experience for those less concerned with absolute charging speed.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G Realme X50 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global
5G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL)HSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 132020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions165.1 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.37 in)159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight216 g (7.62 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (peak)Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 650
OSAndroid 10, upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.0
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens
Triple64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF-
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Dual-32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm-
Video1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with dual speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging33W wired, PD3.065W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAh4200 mAh
Misc
ColorsCosmic Black, Lunar SilverMoss Green, Rust Red
ModelsM2007J3SYRMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076
PriceAbout 240 EURAbout 360 EUR
SAR0.97 W/kg (head)     0.98 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.57 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)-
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 90h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -23.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G

  • Comparable performance to the X50 Pro 5G
  • Solid 90-hour endurance rating
  • Potentially more affordable (depending on current pricing)

  • Significantly slower 33W charging
  • Limited display specifications for detailed comparison
  • Camera details are unknown

Realme X50 Pro 5G

  • Blazing-fast 65W charging (0-100% in 35 minutes)
  • Good display brightness (635 nits)
  • 90-hour endurance rating

  • Performance is identical to the Mi 10T 5G
  • Camera details are unknown
  • May be slightly more expensive

Display Comparison

Both devices feature displays capable of delivering a smooth experience, though detailed specifications beyond the Realme X50 Pro's 635 nits peak brightness are limited. The Realme's 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests a typical AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks. Without knowing the Mi 10T 5G's peak brightness or panel type, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the measured 635 nits of the X50 Pro indicates good outdoor visibility, a practical advantage for everyday use.

Camera Comparison

The provided data only indicates that both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The absence of specifics suggests neither phone boasts a particularly groundbreaking camera system. We can infer that both will likely perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will depend heavily on sensor size and software optimization, information currently unavailable.

Performance

Both the Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G and the Realme X50 Pro 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+). Critically, they share the *same* CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be virtually identical. Performance differences will likely stem from RAM management and thermal throttling, areas not detailed in the provided data. The 7nm+ fabrication process on the Snapdragon 865 is efficient, but sustained loads will still generate heat, potentially impacting performance over extended gaming sessions.

Battery Life

Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the charging experience is where they diverge dramatically. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging, supporting PD, promises a full charge in just 35 minutes. In contrast, the Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G’s 33W wired charging with PD3.0 is significantly slower. This difference is substantial; a user needing a quick top-up before a meeting will overwhelmingly favor the Realme.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G if you prioritize a balanced experience and are comfortable with slightly slower charging. It's ideal for users who value a reliable all-rounder. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly, making it perfect for power users and travelers.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the 33W charging on the Mi 10T 5G feel noticeably slow compared to the 65W on the X50 Pro?
Yes, the difference is substantial. While 33W is still reasonably fast, the 65W on the X50 Pro can fully charge the phone in approximately 35 minutes, whereas the Mi 10T 5G will take considerably longer. This is a key consideration for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ Given both phones have the Snapdragon 865, will I see a difference in gaming performance?
In terms of raw processing power, you likely won't notice a significant difference in gaming. However, sustained gaming performance could vary depending on how each phone manages heat. Without thermal testing data, it's difficult to say which phone will maintain higher frame rates for longer periods.
❓ Are the cameras on these phones significantly different, or are they comparable?
Unfortunately, the provided data doesn't offer enough detail to compare the cameras. Both are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but we lack information on sensor size, aperture, or image processing. It's safe to assume they'll perform adequately in good lighting, but low-light performance is unknown.