Xiaomi Mi 10i 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially slightly better sustained performance, the Xiaomi Mi 10i 5G emerges as the winner. Its 33W charging significantly outperforms the Moto G 5G Plus’s 20W, and the Snapdragon 750G, while built on a slightly larger node, offers competitive performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi 10i 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 05 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 08 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214.5 g (7.55 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 100% in 58 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4820 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pacific Sunrise, Midnight Black, Atlantic Blue | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | M2007J17I | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 0.87 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi 10i 5G
- Significantly faster 33W charging with PD
- Potentially better sustained performance with Snapdragon 750G
- Wider 5G band support
- Display brightness likely lower than Moto G 5G Plus
- No specific camera details available
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Higher peak display brightness (543 nits)
- Potentially better power efficiency with Snapdragon 765
- Proven contrast ratio
- Slower 20W charging
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and overall image pop. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, a figure the Mi 10i 5G’s display specifications do not match. This suggests the Moto G 5G Plus will offer better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels (given the price bracket), the Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on multi-camera setups with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Given the price point, image processing will be a key differentiator, and Motorola has historically focused on natural-looking images, while Xiaomi often leans towards more saturated results. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone prioritizes optical image stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi Mi 10i 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm), while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features the SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm). The 7nm process of the 765 theoretically offers better power efficiency. However, the 750G’s Kryo 570 cores, clocked at up to 2.2 GHz, provide a slight clock speed advantage over the 765’s Kryo 475 Prime core (2.3 GHz, but only one core at that speed). This translates to comparable CPU performance in most tasks, but the 750G’s architecture may offer better sustained performance due to its more modern design. Both phones benefit from 5G connectivity, but the 750G supports a wider range of 5G bands.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Xiaomi Mi 10i 5G supports 33W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), achieving a full charge in just 58 minutes. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is limited to 20W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. This faster charging capability is a significant advantage for the Mi 10i 5G, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10i 5G if you need rapid charging and anticipate extended gaming sessions where sustained performance is crucial. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prioritize a slightly more power-efficient chipset and value a display with proven contrast and brightness, even if it means slower charging speeds and potentially more thermal throttling under heavy load.