Xiaomi Mi 10 Youth 5G vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X50 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly more processing power, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Mi 10 Youth offers respectable performance, the X50 Pro’s 65W charging and comparable battery life make it a more compelling overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Mi 10 Youth 5G | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 27. Released 2020, May 04 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 122mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4160 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Black, Green, Orange/Peach | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | M2002J9E | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Youth 5G
- More affordable price point
- Competent Snapdragon 765G performance for everyday tasks
- Supports Quick Charge and Power Delivery
- Significantly slower charging speed (20W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the X50 Pro
- Missing display details (brightness, refresh rate)
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 865 performance
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (0-100% in 35 minutes)
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price compared to the Mi 10 Youth
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Mi 10 Youth. While both offer a nominal infinite contrast ratio, the X50 Pro’s higher peak brightness will provide better visibility in direct sunlight. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., AMOLED, refresh rate) are missing for the Mi 10 Youth, but the X50 Pro’s display is likely to offer a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience due to its higher brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Realme X50 Pro, being a higher-tier device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The Mi 10 Youth may rely more heavily on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is unknown for both, but would be a significant advantage for the X50 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi Mi 10 Youth 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Realme X50 Pro 5G features the more powerful Snapdragon 865. The 865, built on a 7nm+ process, offers a substantial performance uplift, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. The X50 Pro’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz – significantly outperforms the Kryo 475 Prime in the Mi 10 Youth (2.4 GHz). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both support 5G, the 865’s modem is generally more advanced.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the X50 Pro’s more powerful chipset. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Realme X50 Pro 5G supports 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes, while the Mi 10 Youth 5G is limited to 20W charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support. This faster charging capability is a major advantage for the X50 Pro, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Youth 5G if you prioritize a more affordable entry point into 5G and are willing to trade some raw performance for a lower price. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you demand the fastest possible performance in this price bracket, value rapid 65W charging, and anticipate demanding tasks like gaming or video editing.