Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro vs Civi 4 Pro: Which Mid-Range Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro is the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 offers a noticeable performance uplift, particularly in sustained workloads, and while the Civi 4 Pro remains a capable device, the 5 Pro’s improved CPU architecture and potential for better thermal management make it the winner.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro | Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 22 | 2024, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 22 | Available. Released 2024, March 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 73.2 x 7.5 or 7.7 g | 157.2 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm or 7.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g or 184 g (6.38 oz) | 177.6 or 179.3 g or 180.9 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1236 x 2750 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1236 x 2750 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 2560Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 3200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 2.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, HDR10+, BT.2020, 10-bit video, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 40 minutes |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Rose Gold, Violet, White, Brown | Black, Pink, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24053PY09C |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 380 EUR |
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset
- Improved CPU architecture for better performance
- Potentially better thermal management
- Enhanced image processing capabilities
- Likely higher price point
- May not offer a drastically different experience for casual users
Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro
- Excellent value for money (potentially)
- Fast 67W charging with optimized charging curve
- Still a capable performer for everyday tasks
- Stylish design consistent with the Civi series
- Older Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to the Civi 5 Pro
Display Comparison
Both the Civi 5 Pro and Civi 4 Pro likely feature AMOLED displays, given Xiaomi’s history with the series. However, specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing. The key difference lies under the hood: the Civi 5 Pro benefits from the newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 4’s improved display engine, potentially leading to more efficient power consumption and smoother visuals. While both support 67W charging, the Civi 4 Pro is advertised to reach 100% in 40 minutes, suggesting a slightly optimized charging curve or battery management.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi typically focuses on strong selfie cameras in the Civi line. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4’s improved ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Civi 5 Pro will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions and with dynamic range. The Civi 5 Pro’s ISP will also handle video recording more efficiently, potentially offering higher quality and more stable footage. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera setups, but the Civi 5 Pro’s processing power gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Civi 5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.21 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A720 cores at 3.0 GHz and two more at 2.8 GHz, plus two efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Civi 4 Pro’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) featuring a 3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, four A720 cores at 2.8 GHz, and three A520 cores at 2.0 GHz. The Civi 5 Pro’s higher clock speeds and more powerful core configuration translate to a tangible performance advantage, especially in CPU-intensive tasks. The Gen 4 also benefits from architectural improvements, potentially leading to better sustained performance due to improved thermal efficiency. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the chipset’s memory controller on the Gen 4 is likely more efficient.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3+ support. The Civi 4 Pro’s advertised 40-minute full charge suggests optimized charging algorithms. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4’s improved efficiency in the Civi 5 Pro could offset a potentially smaller battery, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The more efficient CPU and GPU in the Civi 5 Pro will draw less power during typical usage, extending battery endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro if you need the best possible performance for demanding apps, gaming, or multitasking, and value future-proofing. Buy the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro if you prioritize value and can find it at a significantly lower price point, as it still delivers a very good experience for everyday tasks and casual gaming.