Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro vs Honor 90 Pro: Which Snapdragon Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor 90 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its 90W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides ample performance for demanding tasks and gaming, all while potentially offering a more mature software experience. The Civi 5 Pro's newer chipset is promising, but the charging speed is a notable drawback.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro | Honor 90 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 22 | 2023, May 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 22 | Available. Released 2023, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 73.2 x 7.5 or 7.7 g | 163.8 x 74.9 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g or 184 g (6.38 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1236 x 2750 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 2560Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 3200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 2.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ | 90W wired, 3-56% in 15 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Rose Gold, Violet, White, Brown | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue |
| Models | - | REP-AN00 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro
- Newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset
- Potentially better image processing
- Modern CPU core architecture
- Slower 67W charging
- Potential for early software bugs
- Uncertain thermal performance
Honor 90 Pro
- 90W SuperCharge for rapid refueling
- Mature Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 platform
- Likely optimized software experience
- Older chipset architecture
- Potentially lower single-core performance
- May lack the latest ISP features
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in their processing power. The Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro's Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, built on a 4nm process, is architecturally more modern than the Honor 90 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, also 4nm. The 8s Gen 4’s Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.21 GHz promises a performance uplift over the 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 at 3.0 GHz, particularly in single-core tasks. However, the 8+ Gen 1’s more mature software optimization could mitigate some of this theoretical advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. The newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 likely features an upgraded ISP, potentially leading to better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Honor 90 Pro’s 8+ Gen 1 is still a capable ISP, but may not match the Civi 5 Pro in computational photography. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS makes a detailed comparison impossible, but the ISP advantage leans towards the Xiaomi device.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor 90 Pro boasts a different CPU core configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 – compared to the Civi 5 Pro’s 1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720. The 8s Gen 4’s newer core designs and higher clock speeds suggest a performance edge, but the 8+ Gen 1 benefits from extensive optimization. The Civi 5 Pro’s CPU configuration, with more A720 cores, may excel in multi-threaded workloads. Both utilize a 4nm process, but thermal management will be crucial to sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Honor 90 Pro’s 90W wired charging is a significant advantage, capable of charging from 3-56% in just 15 minutes. The Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro’s 67W charging, while respectable, is considerably slower. This difference in charging speed translates to a much more convenient user experience for the Honor 90 Pro, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Honor 90 Pro effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro if you prioritize having the newest silicon and are willing to trade off charging speed for potential future software optimizations. It's ideal for users who frequently update their phones and want to be on the cutting edge. Buy the Honor 90 Pro if you value fast charging, a well-established platform, and a consistently smooth user experience. This phone is perfect for power users and gamers who need minimal downtime.