Xiaomi consistently delivers impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The Civi 1S and Redmi Note 11 are two popular contenders in the mid-range segment, each offering a unique blend of features. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Civi 1S takes the lead with its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G+ chipset and quicker 55W charging. However, the Redmi Note 11 boasts exceptional battery life and a brighter display. Ultimately, the Civi 1S is for performance seekers, while the Note 11 prioritizes longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 21 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 21 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 71.5 x 7 mm (6.23 x 2.81 x 0.28 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~91.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, 24mm (wide), 0.8µm, AF | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, 24mm (wide), 0.8µm, AF | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, QC4, 100% in 45 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink, Silver | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | - | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 330 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Civi 1S
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 778G+)
- 55W Fast Charging
- Likely better camera processing
- AMOLED Display (assumed)
- Potentially shorter battery life
- May be slightly more expensive
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Exceptional Battery Life (126h endurance)
- Brighter Display (736 nits)
- More Affordable
- Good Value for Money
- Slower Processor (Snapdragon 680)
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less powerful camera
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 features a brighter display with a measured peak brightness of 736 nits, making it more visible in direct sunlight. While the Civi 1S has a vibrant AMOLED panel (assumed, based on the Civi series), the Note 11's brightness advantage is noticeable. Both offer good color accuracy, but the Note 11's brightness gives it an edge in outdoor scenarios.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Civi 1S likely has a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. The Redmi Note 11's camera is perfectly serviceable for casual photography, but the Civi 1S should produce more detailed and vibrant images. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Here, the Civi 1S clearly wins. Its Snapdragon 778G+ chipset is significantly more powerful than the Redmi Note 11's Snapdragon 680. Expect smoother performance in games, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the Civi 1S. The Note 11 is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 126 hours is exceptional, suggesting it will easily last a full day or even two on a single charge. The Civi 1S, while offering 55W fast charging, likely has a smaller battery capacity and won't match the Note 11's longevity.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Civi 1S is ideal for users who prioritize performance, smooth multitasking, and faster charging. It's a great choice for mobile gamers and those who frequently use demanding apps. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is perfect for users who value long battery life, a bright display for outdoor use, and a more budget-friendly price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Xiaomi Civi 1S good for gaming?
Yes, the Civi 1S's Snapdragon 778G+ chipset makes it a decent option for mobile gaming, offering smoother performance than the Redmi Note 11.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has significantly better battery life, with an endurance rating of 126 hours.
