The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 and Realme GT Neo 3T represent distinct approaches to delivering performance. The Pad 6 aims to provide an affordable gaming experience in a larger form factor, while the GT Neo 3T packs flagship-level processing into a more conventional smartphone package. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Realme GT Neo 3T is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Black Shark Pad 6’s Unisoc T616 and 18W charging. However, the Pad 6 offers a larger screen for immersive gaming, making it a viable option for dedicated tablet gamers on a tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 29 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 265.8 x 168.3 x 7.9 mm (10.46 x 6.63 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 523 g (1.15 lb) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~78.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired |
| Type | 8800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | - | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 726007 (v9)
GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6
- Larger screen for immersive gaming
- More affordable price point
- Dedicated gaming tablet experience
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slow 18W charging
- Lower display brightness
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 870 performance
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Smaller screen size
- Higher price compared to the Pad 6
- Standard smartphone form factor
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 803 nits, compared to the Black Shark Pad 6’s unspecified brightness. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While the Pad 6 benefits from a larger screen real estate, the GT Neo 3T’s display offers a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. Both devices feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term that doesn't provide substantial differentiating information. The Pad 6’s larger size is its primary advantage, offering a more immersive experience for gaming and video playback.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Given the market positioning, the Realme GT Neo 3T likely features a more refined camera system. The GT Neo 3T’s image processing capabilities, leveraging the Snapdragon 870’s ISP, are expected to be superior. The Black Shark Pad 6’s camera is likely focused on basic functionality for video calls and casual snapshots. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the GT Neo 3T’s overall hardware advantage suggests a better camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Realme GT Neo 3T’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Black Shark Pad 6’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm). The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, delivers superior CPU and GPU performance. The 7nm manufacturing process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Pad 6’s Unisoc chipset, while adequate for casual gaming, will struggle with demanding titles at higher settings. The GT Neo 3T’s LPDDR4X RAM further enhances its performance capabilities.
Battery Life
Both the Black Shark Pad 6 and Realme GT Neo 3T achieve an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Realme GT Neo 3T’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Black Shark Pad 6’s 18W charging. This rapid charging capability is a significant convenience factor for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. While the Pad 6’s larger battery capacity *could* offer slightly longer screen-on time, the GT Neo 3T’s charging speed is a more impactful advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 if you need a larger screen for immersive gaming and media consumption, and are willing to compromise on processing power and charging speed. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you prioritize flagship-level performance, incredibly fast 80W charging, and a more portable form factor for gaming and everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Black Shark Pad 6 powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Unisoc Tiger T616 can run Genshin Impact, expect to play at lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame rate drops. It's best suited for less demanding titles or casual gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 870 in the Realme GT Neo 3T offers a significantly smoother experience with Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Realme GT Neo 3T with the 80W charger?
The Realme GT Neo 3T can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 31-35 minutes with the included 80W charger. This is a substantial advantage over the Black Shark Pad 6, which will take considerably longer with its 18W charging.
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 3T get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 is known for its relatively good thermal efficiency. While some heat is inevitable during extended gaming, the GT Neo 3T’s cooling system generally prevents significant throttling. The 7nm process node contributes to lower heat generation compared to the 12nm Unisoc chip in the Black Shark Pad 6.
