Black Shark Pad 6 vs. Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: A Deep Dive for Mobile Gamers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average gamer prioritizing raw power and portability, the Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and 65W charging significantly outperform the Black Shark Pad 6's Unisoc T616 and 18W charging. However, the Pad 6 offers a larger screen at a much lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 | Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 - Version A |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Version A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2024/210 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 - Version B | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 29 | 2022, July 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 265.8 x 168.3 x 7.9 mm (10.46 x 6.63 x 0.31 in) | 173 x 77 x 10.3 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 523 g (1.15 lb) | 239 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | IPX4 water resistant 2" OLED display (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~78.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 512GB 18GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 NTFS support for external storage | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 12 MP, 28mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green | Storm White |
| Models | - | AI2201_D |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 800 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 973756 (v8), 1103188 (v9) GeekBench: 3980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 79fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6
- Larger screen size for immersive gaming
- More affordable price point
- Suitable for casual gaming and media consumption
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slow 18W charging
- Lower overall performance
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- 65W fast charging with multiple protocols
- High-brightness, high-contrast display
- Higher price tag
- Smaller screen size compared to the Pad 6
- May require accessories for optimal gaming comfort
Display Comparison
The Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 829 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in bright conditions. While the Black Shark Pad 6’s display specs are not provided, its tablet form factor inherently offers a larger viewing area. The ROG Phone 6 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel, likely offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors than what is typically found in tablets at the Pad 6’s price point. The ROG Phone’s smaller size also means a higher pixel density, potentially resulting in a sharper image.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Given the ROG Phone 6 Pro’s flagship status, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The Black Shark Pad 6’s camera is likely adequate for casual use but won’t compete with the ROG Phone 6 Pro in terms of image quality or features. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison, but the ROG Phone 6 Pro’s overall hardware suggests a superior photographic experience.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-tier chipset, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores. This architecture delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm). The T616, with its Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, is designed for efficiency and affordability, not peak performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The ROG Phone 6 Pro will handle demanding titles at higher settings and frame rates with ease, while the Pad 6 will likely struggle with graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the difference in battery capacity (not specified for the Pad 6). However, the Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro’s 65W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC5 support is a game-changer, achieving a 100% charge in just 42 minutes. The Black Shark Pad 6’s 18W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to fully recharge. The ROG Phone 6 Pro also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pad 6, allowing it to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 if you need a large, affordable screen for casual gaming and media consumption, and portability isn't a primary concern. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro if you prioritize uncompromising performance, fast charging, and a premium gaming experience in a pocketable form factor, and are willing to pay a premium.