Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Gaming Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Black Shark 5 thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, brighter display, and faster wireless charging. While the Black Shark 5 boasts incredibly fast wired charging, the Poco F5 Pro offers a more well-rounded and refined experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 04 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.3 x 10 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Joy UI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4650 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gray | Black, White |
| Models | SHARK PAR-A0 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 600 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Aggressive cooling system for sustained performance
- Dedicated gaming features (shoulder triggers)
- Less bright display compared to Poco F5 Pro
- Design can be polarizing
- No wireless charging
- Camera performance not as strong as Poco F5 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Fast 67W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Premium design and build quality
- Likely better camera performance
- Charging speed slower than Black Shark 5
- Gaming-specific features (triggers) are absent
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load compared to Black Shark 5's cooling
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro's display is a clear winner. Its 1059 nits peak brightness significantly outshines the Black Shark 5, offering better visibility in sunlight. The infinite contrast ratio suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. While the Black Shark 5 has a decent display, it lacks the Poco F5 Pro's visual punch.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Poco F5 Pro likely holds an advantage. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1's image signal processor (ISP) generally delivers better image quality and video recording capabilities. Specific camera specs are missing, but the Poco F5 Pro's overall hardware is expected to be superior.
Performance
The Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Black Shark 5's Snapdragon 870. This translates to smoother gameplay, quicker app loading times, and better overall responsiveness. The Poco F5 Pro's 4nm process also contributes to improved thermal management.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (99h). However, the Poco F5 Pro's 67W wired charging and 30W wireless charging offer more flexibility and convenience compared to the Black Shark 5's 120W wired charging. While the Black Shark 5 charges faster, the Poco F5 Pro's wireless charging is a significant bonus.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is ideal for hardcore gamers who prioritize maximum performance and don't mind a more utilitarian design. The Poco F5 Pro is a better choice for users who want a powerful phone with a stunning display, versatile camera, and a more premium feel, while still offering excellent gaming capabilities.