The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is a dedicated gaming phone, boasting powerful hardware and specialized features. The Poco F5, on the other hand, aims to deliver exceptional value with a strong all-around performance. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which device emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 offers a more balanced package with a brighter display, excellent battery life, and the newer Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. While the Black Shark 5 has a faster charging speed and a slightly more powerful chipset, the Poco F5's overall value and improved display make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 04 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.3 x 10 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | Physical pop-up gaming triggers | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, Joy UI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4650 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gray | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | SHARK PAR-A0 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 600 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Faster Charging (120W)
- Slightly More Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 870)
- Dedicated Gaming Features (shoulder triggers)
- Less Bright Display
- Shorter Battery Life
- Higher Price
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Brighter and Higher Contrast Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- More Efficient Chipset (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Better Value for Money
- Slower Charging (67W)
- Slightly Less Raw Power
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, offering a significantly more vibrant and immersive viewing experience compared to the Black Shark 5's display. While the Black Shark 5's display is adequate, it lacks the Poco F5's brightness and contrast.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two devices, with both offering decent photo and video capabilities. The Poco F5 might have a slight advantage in image processing due to its newer chipset, but the difference is not substantial. Both phones lack advanced camera features found in higher-end devices.
Performance
The Black Shark 5's Snapdragon 870 offers a slight edge in raw CPU power, particularly in demanding games. However, the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is incredibly efficient and provides excellent performance for everyday tasks and most games, closing the gap considerably. The Poco F5's newer architecture also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118 hours and an active use score of 11:52 hours. The Black Shark 5, while offering incredibly fast 120W charging, has a smaller battery and shorter battery life overall.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is ideal for hardcore mobile gamers who prioritize raw performance and fast charging above all else. The Poco F5 is perfect for users seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a great display, long battery life, and a competitive price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Black Shark 5 good for gaming?
Yes, the Black Shark 5 is designed for gaming with its powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset and dedicated gaming features like shoulder triggers. However, the Poco F5 offers surprisingly good gaming performance as well.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Poco F5 has significantly better battery life than the Black Shark 5, offering longer usage times and an impressive endurance rating.
