Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Gaming Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT edges out the Black Shark 5 thanks to its newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and potentially better sustained performance. However, the Black Shark 5's 120W charging is slightly faster, and its dedicated gaming features might appeal to hardcore mobile gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 04 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.3 x 10 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Joy UI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4650 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gray | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | SHARK PAR-A0 | 21121210G |
| Price | About 600 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Dedicated gaming triggers
- Excellent cooling system
- Faster 120W charging
- Aggressive gaming design
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 870)
- Less refined software compared to Poco
- Potentially less sustained performance
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Excellent battery life (81h endurance)
- Faster charging (PD3.0, QC3)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 thermal throttling potential
- Gaming triggers absent
- Design less focused on gaming aesthetics
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. The Poco F4 GT's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, but real-world differences are likely minimal. Both offer excellent viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones offering capable photo and video capabilities. The Poco F4 GT might have a slight edge in image processing due to its newer chipset, but both are unlikely to compete with flagship camera phones. Expect decent results in well-lit conditions.
Performance
The Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 holds a significant advantage over the Black Shark 5's Snapdragon 870. While the 870 is still a capable chip, the 8 Gen 1 offers noticeably faster processing speeds and improved graphics performance, especially in demanding games. However, the 8 Gen 1 is known to have thermal throttling issues, which could impact sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Poco F4 GT boasting an endurance rating of 81 hours. The Black Shark 5's 120W charging is marginally faster than the Poco F4 GT's 120W charging (15 minutes vs 17 minutes to 100%), providing a quicker top-up.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is ideal for dedicated mobile gamers who prioritize dedicated gaming features like shoulder triggers and a focus on cooling. The Poco F4 GT is a better choice for those seeking a well-rounded flagship experience with strong performance and a vibrant display, alongside gaming capabilities.