Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Black Shark 4: The Ultimate Gaming Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Black Shark 5 offers a slightly faster charging speed and potentially improved thermal management. However, the Black Shark 4 boasts exceptional battery life and a very competitive price. For most gamers, the Black Shark 5 is a worthwhile upgrade, but the 4 remains a fantastic value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 04 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.3 x 10 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 163.8 x 76.4 x 9.9 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers | Physical pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, Joy UI 13 | Android 11, Joy UI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 120W wired, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4650 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gray | Mirror Black, Pale Grey, Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | SHARK PAR-A0 | SHARK PRS-H0, SHARK PRS-A0, SHARK KSR-A0 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 617456 (v8) GeekBench: 3448 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Faster 120W Charging
- Potentially Improved Cooling
- Slightly Updated Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Higher Price
- Battery Life Not as Exceptional as Black Shark 4
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
- Exceptional Battery Life (96h Endurance)
- Competitive Price
- Excellent Performance with Snapdragon 870
- Good Display Quality
- Slower Charging Speed (17 min for 100%)
- Older Design
- May lack some of the latest features
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, providing a smooth gaming experience. The Black Shark 4 has a measured max brightness of 694 nits, while the Black Shark 5 likely has a slightly higher brightness, though specific measurements are not available. The Black Shark 4's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal value, and real-world performance will be similar between the two.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two phones. Both offer decent photo and video capabilities, but neither is a standout in the smartphone camera market. Expect similar image quality and features.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 870, ensuring excellent performance for demanding games. The Black Shark 5 may have slightly improved cooling solutions, potentially allowing for sustained peak performance for longer periods. However, in everyday use, the performance difference will be minimal.
Battery Life
The Black Shark 4 shines in this category, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 96 hours. The Black Shark 5, while still offering good battery life, doesn't quite match the longevity of its predecessor. However, the Black Shark 5's 120W charging significantly reduces charging times.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is ideal for serious gamers who prioritize faster charging and potentially better sustained performance. The Black Shark 4 is a great choice for budget-conscious gamers who value long battery life and don't need the absolute latest features.