Black Shark 5 vs Asus ROG Phone 5s: A Deep Dive into Gaming Performance and Value

The gaming phone market offers a compelling alternative to mainstream flagships, prioritizing performance and features for mobile gamers. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 and Asus ROG Phone 5s represent two distinct approaches: the Black Shark 5 focuses on aggressive pricing with a slightly older, yet efficient, chipset, while the ROG Phone 5s aims for top-tier performance with the Snapdragon 888+ and a more refined feature set. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best gaming experience for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average gamer prioritizing value, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 offers a compelling package. Its 120W charging is significantly faster than the ROG Phone 5s’s 65W, and the Snapdragon 870 provides excellent performance at a lower cost. However, the ROG Phone 5s’s Snapdragon 888+ offers a performance edge for demanding titles and sustained workloads.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Asus ROG Phone 5s
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - Version 1
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Version 1
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 1400/150 Mbps, 5G 4 Gbps DL
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Version 4
Launch
Announced2022, March 302021, August 16
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, April 04Available. Released 2021, August 26
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame
Dimensions163.8 x 76.3 x 10 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.39 in)172.8 x 77.3 x 9.9 mm (6.80 x 3.04 x 0.39 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight218 g (7.69 oz)238 g (8.40 oz)
 Physical pop-up gaming triggersRGB light panel (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak)AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak)
 Always-on display-
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 660
OSAndroid 12, Joy UI 13Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ROG UI
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 11mm, 125˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama, HDR
Single16 MP, (wide)24 MP, f/2.5, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers)
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired, 100% in 15 min65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 70% in 30 min, 100% in 52 min 10W reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4650 mAhLi-Po 6000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, GrayPhantom Black, Storm White
ModelsSHARK PAR-A0ZS676KS
PriceAbout 600 EURAbout 1030 EUR

Xiaomi Black Shark 5

  • Incredibly fast 120W charging
  • More affordable price point
  • Excellent performance for the price

  • Snapdragon 870 is less powerful than 888+
  • Potentially less refined software experience

Asus ROG Phone 5s

  • More powerful Snapdragon 888+ processor
  • Potentially better camera performance
  • Refined software experience

  • Slower 65W charging
  • Higher price tag

Display Comparison

While both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the underlying processing power impacting game rendering. The Snapdragon 888+ in the ROG Phone 5s will push higher frame rates in graphically intensive games, assuming the display supports it. The Black Shark 5’s Snapdragon 870, while capable, will require some graphical settings adjustments to maintain consistent performance. The 5nm process of the 888+ also suggests better power efficiency during display-heavy tasks.

Camera Comparison

Neither phone is primarily marketed for its camera capabilities, but the ROG Phone 5s likely has a more versatile camera system due to Asus’s broader imaging expertise. While specific sensor details are missing, the Snapdragon 888+’s image signal processor (ISP) offers more advanced features and processing capabilities compared to the 870’s ISP. Expect better dynamic range and low-light performance from the ROG Phone 5s. The Black Shark 5 will likely suffice for casual photography, but serious photographers will lean towards the ROG Phone 5s.

Performance

The Asus ROG Phone 5s boasts the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm), a clear upgrade over the Xiaomi Black Shark 5’s SM8250 Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm). The 888+ features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.99 GHz, offering a performance advantage over the 870’s Kryo 585 prime core at 3.2 GHz. While the 870’s clock speed is higher, the 888+’s architectural improvements and smaller node size translate to superior sustained performance and efficiency. This means the ROG Phone 5s is better equipped to handle demanding games and multitasking without significant throttling. The ROG Phone 5s also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance.

Battery Life

The Black Shark 5’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 15 minutes. This is significantly faster than the ROG Phone 5s’s 65W charging, which takes 52 minutes for a full charge. While the ROG Phone 5s offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Black Shark 5, the speed advantage of the Black Shark 5’s charging is substantial. The actual battery capacity (mAh) is unknown for both, but the faster charging of the Black Shark 5 mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 if you need blazing-fast charging, a more affordable price point, and excellent performance for most mobile games. It’s ideal for gamers who want a powerful experience without breaking the bank. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 5s if you prioritize raw processing power for the most demanding games, appreciate a more polished software experience, and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 888+ and its associated benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 888+ in the ROG Phone 5s experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 888+ is known to generate more heat than the 870. Asus ROG Phone 5s incorporates advanced cooling solutions (likely a vapor chamber and/or external fan accessory) to mitigate throttling. However, sustained peak performance may still result in some thermal throttling after prolonged, demanding gameplay. The Black Shark 5, with its less powerful chip, will likely experience less throttling.
❓ How does the 120W charging of the Black Shark 5 impact battery health over the long term?
While 120W charging is incredibly fast, concerns about long-term battery health are valid. Xiaomi likely employs sophisticated charging algorithms and temperature control mechanisms to minimize battery degradation. However, consistently using ultra-fast charging *may* accelerate battery aging compared to slower charging methods. The ROG Phone 5s’s 65W charging is less likely to have this effect.
❓ Does either phone support external displays at high refresh rates for console-like gaming?
The ROG Phone 5s is more likely to support external displays at higher refresh rates (120Hz or higher) via DisplayPort over USB-C, catering to console-like gaming experiences. The Black Shark 5’s external display support is less certain and may be limited to lower refresh rates.