Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS vs 5 Pro: The Ultimate Gaming Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Black Shark 5 Pro generally edges out the RS with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and potentially better display. However, the RS offers a more aggressive price point and a slightly faster charging speed. Ultimately, the Pro delivers a more premium experience, while the RS provides excellent value for budget-conscious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2022, March 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 04 | Available. Released 2022, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.2 x 9.9 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 163.9 x 76.5 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84/3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Joy UI 12.8 | Android 12, Joy UI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1/SSD 256GB 8GB RAM - Snapdragon 888 256GB 12GB RAM - Snapdragon 888+ | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps; HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps; HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (China only) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4650 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow | Black, White |
| Models | - | SHARK KTUS-H0 |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 720 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 876704 (v8), 1007133 (v9) GeekBench: 3665 (v5.1) GFXBench: 82fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
- More affordable
- 120W fast charging (slightly faster)
- Aggressive gaming design
- Powerful Snapdragon 888/888+
- Slightly older chipset
- Potentially less bright display
- Camera details are limited
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
- Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially brighter and more vibrant display
- Improved thermal management
- Premium build quality (likely)
- More expensive
- 120W fast charging (slightly slower)
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 144Hz). The 5 Pro boasts a measured 682 nits max brightness, suggesting a slightly brighter and more vibrant display. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the 5 Pro is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data, but it implies excellent contrast. The 5 RS display is likely very good, but may not reach the same peak brightness as the Pro.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse in the provided specs. Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup, but the 5 Pro's newer chipset might offer slightly improved image processing capabilities. Expect similar overall camera performance, with the 5 Pro potentially having a slight edge in low-light conditions and video recording.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the 5 Pro offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Snapdragon 888/888+ in the 5 RS. While both are powerful, the 8 Gen 1's newer architecture and 4nm process provide better efficiency and raw power, leading to smoother gameplay and potentially better sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. Expect slightly better thermal management on the 5 Pro as well.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The 120W wired charging on both devices ensures incredibly fast charging times – both reaching 100% in approximately 15 minutes. Battery performance is expected to be very similar between the two.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is ideal for gamers on a tighter budget who still want a powerful gaming experience with fast charging. The Black Shark 5 Pro is for serious gamers who prioritize top-tier performance, a potentially superior display, and are willing to pay a premium for it.