Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro vs Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly brighter display, more efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, and faster wireless charging. While the Black Shark 5 Pro boasts incredibly fast wired charging, the Poco F5 Pro's improvements in other areas make it the more well-rounded choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 04 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.5 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Joy UI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto macro), AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps; HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, video output | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (China only) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4650 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, White |
| Models | SHARK KTUS-H0 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 720 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 83h | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 876704 (v8), 1007133 (v9) GeekBench: 3665 (v5.1) GFXBench: 82fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Dedicated gaming features (shoulder triggers)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Aggressive design
- Lower display brightness compared to Poco F5 Pro
- Less efficient chipset
- Camera performance may not be top-tier
- Design might be polarizing
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Wireless charging support
- Excellent value for money
- Sleek and modern design
- Wired charging slower than Black Shark 5 Pro
- Gaming-specific features absent
- Camera may lack advanced features
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro's display is a clear winner. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, significantly higher than the Black Shark 5 Pro's 682 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight and a more vibrant viewing experience. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Poco's brightness advantage is undeniable. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable, given both phones are in a similar price bracket. Both likely feature a main 50MP sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Image quality will depend on software processing and scene optimization. Expect decent results in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance might be a weak point for both.
Performance
While both phones utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, the Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a noticeable performance boost over the Black Shark 5 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. The 8+ Gen 1 is more efficient, resulting in better sustained performance and potentially improved battery life under load. Both have the same CPU configuration, but the 8+ Gen 1's GPU is superior.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro takes the lead in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 99h rating compared to the Black Shark 5 Pro's 83h. While both offer substantial battery life, the Poco's efficiency advantage shines through. The Black Shark 5 Pro's 120W wired charging is incredibly fast (15 minutes to 100%), but the Poco F5 Pro offers 67W wired and 30W wireless charging, providing more versatility.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is ideal for hardcore mobile gamers prioritizing blazing-fast wired charging and a dedicated gaming experience. The Poco F5 Pro is perfect for users seeking a balance of performance, a stunning display, and versatile features at a competitive price.