Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro vs Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Gaming Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT edges out the Black Shark 4S Pro thanks to its newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and slightly faster charging. However, the Black Shark 4S Pro's shoulder triggers and potentially better cooling solution make it a strong choice for dedicated mobile gamers prioritizing tactile controls.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 13 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 16 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.2 x 9.9 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, Joy UI 12.8 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps; HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | - | 21121210G |
| Price | About 650 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro
- Physical shoulder triggers for enhanced gaming
- Potentially better sustained performance due to cooling
- Fast 120W charging
- Aggressive gaming design
- Older Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- Design may not appeal to everyone
- Camera potentially slightly behind Poco F4 GT
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Excellent battery life (81h endurance)
- Fast 120W charging
- More versatile design
- Lacks physical gaming triggers
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays, likely with high refresh rates (assumed 120Hz or higher). The 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Poco F4 GT might have a slight edge in brightness due to the newer generation panel, but real-world differences will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable, with both phones offering capable main sensors and ultrawide lenses. Image processing and video recording quality will depend on software optimization. Expect decent results in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance might be a differentiator.
Performance
The Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers a generational performance leap over the Black Shark 4S Pro's Snapdragon 888+. Expect smoother gameplay, faster app loading, and better multitasking on the Poco F4 GT. However, the Black Shark 4S Pro's cooling system might help it maintain performance under prolonged heavy load.
Battery Life
The Poco F4 GT boasts an impressive endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Black Shark 4S Pro's 120W charging is faster, reaching 100% in 15 minutes versus 17 minutes for the Poco F4 GT. However, battery capacity is likely similar, so the Poco F4 GT's efficiency gives it the edge in longevity.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro is ideal for gamers who value physical gaming controls (shoulder triggers) and potentially better sustained performance through improved cooling. The Poco F4 GT is a better choice for those seeking the latest chipset, slightly faster charging, and a more versatile overall package without the dedicated gaming aesthetic.