Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro vs Black Shark 5: The Ultimate Gaming Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Black Shark 4S Pro takes the crown thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ chipset, offering a noticeable performance boost over the 870 in the Black Shark 5. While both offer 120W charging, the 4S Pro's slightly faster charging and overall power make it the superior choice for serious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 13 | 2022, March 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 16 | Available. Released 2022, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.2 x 9.9 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 163.8 x 76.3 x 10 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers | Physical pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Joy UI 12.8 | Android 12, Joy UI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps; HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4650 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, White, Gray |
| Models | - | SHARK PAR-A0 |
| Price | About 650 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 888+)
- Faster 120W Charging
- Slightly Improved Color Accuracy (potentially)
- Aggressive Gaming Aesthetics
- Higher Price
- Potential for Increased Heat Generation
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- More Affordable
- Excellent Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Good Battery Life
- Aggressive Gaming Aesthetics
- Slightly Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset compared to 4S Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth visuals. The 4S Pro *may* have slightly improved color accuracy, but the difference is minimal and difficult to discern in real-world use. Both have touch sampling rates exceeding 400Hz for responsive gameplay.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a triple-camera system, typically including a 108MP main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Image quality is generally comparable, with both phones producing decent photos in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is adequate but not exceptional. The 4S Pro *might* have slightly better image processing due to the more powerful chipset.
Performance
This is where the 4S Pro shines. The Snapdragon 888+ is significantly faster than the Snapdragon 870, resulting in smoother frame rates in demanding games and quicker app loading times. While the 870 is still a capable chip, the 888+ provides a tangible advantage for competitive gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 4500mAh battery and support 120W wired charging. The 4S Pro charges slightly faster (5 min to 50%, 15 min to 100%) compared to the Black Shark 5 (15 min to 100%). Battery life is comparable in typical usage, lasting a full day for most users.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro is ideal for hardcore mobile gamers who demand the absolute best performance and are willing to pay a premium. The Black Shark 5 remains a fantastic option for gamers on a tighter budget who still want a powerful and feature-rich gaming experience.