Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro vs Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Gaming Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT edges out the Black Shark 4 Pro thanks to its slightly newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and potentially improved thermal management. While both offer blazing-fast 120W charging, the F4 GT's overall package provides a more modern and refined gaming experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 30 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.4 x 9.9 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.39 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, Joy UI 12.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps; HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2 (China), 5.0 (Global), A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (China only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shadow Black, Misty Grey, Cosmos Black, Dark Blue, Silver | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | SHARK PAR-H0 | 21121210G |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro
- Dedicated gaming triggers
- Aggressive gaming design
- 120W fast charging
- Excellent performance
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 888)
- Design may not appeal to everyone
- Camera performance is average
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Excellent battery life (81h endurance)
- 120W fast charging
- Sleek and modern design
- Gaming triggers absent
- Camera performance is average
- Potential thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays, likely offering vibrant colors and smooth visuals. While both claim 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), expect excellent contrast and deep blacks. The Poco F4 GT might have a slight edge in brightness due to its newer panel, but real-world differences will be minimal. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable on both devices, featuring versatile setups with main, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but don't expect flagship-level photography. Video recording capabilities should be similar, supporting 4K resolution.
Performance
The Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 holds a slight advantage over the Black Shark 4 Pro's Snapdragon 888. The 8 Gen 1 boasts a newer architecture and improved efficiency. However, both phones are incredibly powerful and will handle demanding games with ease. Thermal management will be a key factor in sustained performance; the F4 GT's design may offer better cooling.
Battery Life
The Poco F4 GT boasts an endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting superior battery optimization and potentially a slightly larger battery capacity. Both phones support incredibly fast 120W charging, allowing for rapid top-ups. However, the F4 GT's longer endurance rating gives it a clear advantage in overall battery life.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro is ideal for gamers who prioritize aggressive styling, dedicated gaming triggers, and a slightly more mature design. The Poco F4 GT is a better choice for those seeking the latest Snapdragon chipset, a more streamlined design, and a potentially more efficient battery, all while maintaining excellent gaming performance.