Xiaomi 17 vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and AI
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and charging speed, the Xiaomi 17 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and 100W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 and 23W charging. However, the Pixel 7 Pro remains a compelling choice for those deeply invested in Google’s ecosystem and camera software.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 17 | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 25 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 27 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragon Crystal Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.1 x 71.8 x 8.1 mm (5.95 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2656 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~464 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.1 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 2160Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.6x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps (HDR), 4K@30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), PDAF | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS 50W wireless 22.5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink, White | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | - | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 540 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi 17
- Significantly faster charging (100W)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5)
- Potentially better thermal management (3nm process)
- Camera details currently unknown
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional computational photography
- Seamless Google ecosystem integration
- Solid battery endurance (83h rating)
- Slower charging speed (23W)
- Less powerful processor (Tensor G2)
- Potential for software bloat
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Xiaomi 17’s display specs are currently unknown, Xiaomi flagships typically prioritize high brightness and color accuracy. The Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a high-quality OLED panel. The absence of refresh rate information for the Xiaomi 17 is notable; a high refresh rate (120Hz or higher) would be expected to compete directly with the Pixel 7 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable photo and video capabilities, but their approaches differ. The Pixel 7 Pro excels in computational photography, leveraging Google’s AI algorithms for stunning image processing. The Xiaomi 17’s camera specs are currently unknown, but Xiaomi often focuses on high-resolution sensors and advanced features. Without sensor size or aperture details for the Xiaomi 17, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the Pixel 7 Pro. The Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing prioritizes realistic colors and dynamic range, while Xiaomi often leans towards more vibrant, saturated images.
Performance
The Xiaomi 17’s Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in mobile processing. Its octa-core CPU, featuring Oryon V3 Phoenix L and M cores clocked up to 4.6 GHz, promises substantial performance gains over the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Tensor G2’s CPU, with its Cortex-X1 and Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 2.85 GHz, is optimized for AI tasks but lags behind in raw CPU horsepower. The 3nm node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 also implies superior thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Xiaomi 17 is expected to utilize LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 83 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Xiaomi 17’s charging capabilities are dramatically faster, offering 100W wired charging (with PD3.0, QC3+, and 100W PPS support), 50W wireless charging, and 22.5W reverse wireless charging. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired and wireless charging are significantly slower. While the Pixel 7 Pro’s battery endurance is respectable, the Xiaomi 17’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups, mitigating concerns about battery life. A full charge on the Xiaomi 17 is expected to take under 30 minutes, while the Pixel 7 Pro requires approximately 30 minutes for a 50% charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 17 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, content creation, or heavy multitasking, and value incredibly fast charging. You’ll benefit from the latest silicon and a focus on speed. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional computational photography, and a tighter integration with Google services. It’s the ideal choice for users who prioritize AI-powered features and a refined user interface.