Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life and raw processing power, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is the clear winner. Its 20:50h active use score and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset offer a significant advantage. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra excels in display brightness and camera versatility, making it ideal for content creators and visual enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 25 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragon Crystal Glass 3), aluminum frame | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 77.6 x 8 mm (6.41 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.6 cm2 (~92.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 2160Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 115mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps (HDR), 4K@30/60/120fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS 50W wireless 22.5W reverse wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple, Green | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | 2509FPN0BC | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 720 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Exceptional battery life (20:50h active use)
- Faster charging speeds (100W wired)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Lower peak display brightness
- Camera system details unknown, potentially less versatile
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Brighter display (1447 nits)
- Refined camera system with advanced features
- Polished software experience
- Shorter battery life (13:49h active use)
- Slower charging speeds (45W wired)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra immediately pulls ahead in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1447 nits compared to the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max’s 1026 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, Samsung’s superior brightness and potentially wider color gamut provide a more immersive viewing experience. The Xiaomi’s display, while still excellent, is geared towards efficiency rather than outright visual dominance.
Camera Comparison
The provided data focuses on the chipsets, not the camera systems. However, given Samsung’s history, the S24 Ultra likely features a more versatile camera setup with a greater emphasis on computational photography and advanced features like Space Zoom. Xiaomi has been improving its camera capabilities, but Samsung typically leads in image processing and video stabilization. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the S24 Ultra’s reputation suggests a more refined and feature-rich camera experience.
Performance
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max’s Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in mobile processing. Its octa-core configuration (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) promises superior multi-core performance compared to the Samsung’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) which is fabricated on a 4nm node. The 3nm process should translate to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is still a powerhouse, and real-world differences may be less pronounced for typical usage.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max’s battery performance is its standout feature, achieving an impressive 20:50h of active use. This significantly surpasses the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s 13:49h. While the S24 Ultra offers 45W wired charging and 65% charge in 30 minutes, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max boasts a much faster 100W wired charging, alongside 50W wireless and 22.5W reverse wireless capabilities. This charging speed advantage, combined with the larger battery capacity implied by the longer runtime, makes the Xiaomi the clear winner for users who prioritize battery life and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max if you need exceptional battery life for demanding tasks like gaming or content creation, and value raw CPU/GPU performance for sustained periods. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption, a refined camera experience with advanced features, and a more polished software ecosystem.