Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Battle of Endurance and Brilliance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is the clear winner. Its exceptional 20:50h active use battery score significantly outpaces the Oppo’s 12:47h. However, those who value a brighter, more vibrant display will find the Oppo Find X7 Ultra more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 25 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragon Crystal Glass 3), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 77.6 x 8 mm (6.41 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.6 cm2 (~92.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 2160Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 115mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps (HDR), 4K@30/60/120fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS 50W wireless 22.5W reverse wireless | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple, Green | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | 2509FPN0BC | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | $ 546.64 |
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Exceptional battery life (20:50h)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor
- 22.5W reverse wireless charging
- Lower peak display brightness (1026 nits)
- Charging time not specified
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Brighter display (1165 nits)
- Faster charging (100% in 26 minutes)
- Thermally efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Significantly shorter battery life (12:47h)
- Lower reverse wireless charging (10W)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra takes the lead in display brightness, achieving a measured 1165 nits compared to the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max’s 1026 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (based on flagship positioning), the Oppo’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. We expect both to have excellent color accuracy, but the Oppo’s brightness gives it an edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset differences suggest the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ISP will offer more advanced image processing capabilities. Both phones will likely feature excellent camera systems, but the Oppo’s processor could provide an edge in computational photography, such as low-light performance and dynamic range. We anticipate both will feature robust optical image stabilization (OIS) on their main sensors.
Performance
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is equipped with the Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V3 Phoenix L and M cores clocked up to 4.6 GHz. This contrasts with the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (SM8650-AB) with its Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5’s Oryon cores, designed by Qualcomm, are expected to deliver superior multi-core performance, potentially benefiting demanding applications. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process node offers improved thermal efficiency compared to the 3nm node of the 8 Elite Gen 5, potentially mitigating throttling under sustained load. The Xiaomi’s architecture suggests a focus on raw power, while the Oppo prioritizes sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max dominates in battery endurance with a remarkable 20:50h active use score, significantly exceeding the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 12:47h. While both support 100W wired charging, the Oppo boasts a faster 0-100% charge time of 26 minutes, compared to an unspecified time for the Xiaomi. Both offer 50W wireless charging, but the Xiaomi also includes 22.5W reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the Oppo. The Xiaomi’s larger battery capacity and superior efficiency clearly prioritize longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max if you need all-day battery life, even with heavy usage, and demand the highest possible CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize a stunning display for media consumption, appreciate faster charging speeds, and prefer a more polished software experience, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.