Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs. vivo X200 Pro mini: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and superior battery endurance (58:58h) provide a more reliable experience, despite the vivo X200 Pro mini’s impressive Dimensity 9400.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 15 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 27 | 2024, October 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 27 | Available. Released 2024, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 75.3 x 9.4 mm (6.35 x 2.96 x 0.37 in) | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8.2 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 226 g or 229 g (7.97 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Xiaomi Shield Glass 2.0, Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 3200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G925 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, 70mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3x optical zoom 200 MP, f/2.6, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 80W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5410 mAh - Global· Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh - China | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Silver Chrome, Green | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Models | 25010PN30G | V2419A |
| Price | $ 1,328.84 / £ 889.00 / € 1,099.00 | About 610 EUR |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 58:58h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- Exceptional Battery Life (58:58h endurance)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite Processor
- Fastest Charging Speeds (90W wired, 80W wireless)
- Potentially Larger and Heavier Form Factor
- May be more expensive
vivo X200 Pro mini
- Compact and Pocketable Design
- Latest MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Chipset
- Competitive Charging Speeds (90W wired)
- Lower Battery Endurance
- Potential for Thermal Throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While display specs are missing for both devices, the focus here is on processing power. However, given both brands’ history, we can expect high-refresh-rate LTPO AMOLED panels. The key difference will likely be color calibration and peak brightness, with Xiaomi traditionally favoring more vibrant colors and vivo leaning towards accuracy. The compact nature of the X200 Pro mini suggests a smaller display, potentially impacting multitasking.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but both manufacturers are known for their imaging prowess. The Xiaomi 15 Ultra, given its 'Ultra' branding, is likely to feature a larger main sensor and a more versatile camera system. The vivo X200 Pro mini, while compact, will likely leverage MediaTek’s APU for advanced image processing. Expect both phones to excel in low-light photography, but the Xiaomi’s larger sensor size (if present) will likely provide a dynamic range advantage. The absence of details prevents a deeper analysis of lens apertures and OIS capabilities.
Performance
The core battleground is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) in the Xiaomi 15 Ultra versus the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) in the vivo X200 Pro mini. The Snapdragon 8 Elite utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores – two ‘Phoenix L’ at 4.32 GHz and six ‘Phoenix M’ at 3.53 GHz – designed for exceptional single-core and multi-core performance. The Dimensity 9400 counters with a 1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 configuration. While the X925 boasts a higher clock speed, the Oryon architecture is known for its efficiency and instruction throughput. The Snapdragon’s LPDDR5x RAM support further enhances its memory bandwidth, potentially leading to smoother performance in memory-intensive tasks. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s architecture *should* offer better sustained performance due to its efficiency.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance with a reported 58:58h rating and 1000 cycles, compared to the vivo X200 Pro mini’s unspecified endurance. The Xiaomi also supports 90W wired, 80W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering unparalleled flexibility. The vivo X200 Pro mini offers 90W wired and 30W wireless charging, alongside reverse wired charging, but the lower wireless charging speed and potentially smaller battery capacity will result in shorter usage times between charges. The Xiaomi’s 16:13h active use score further solidifies its lead in battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 15 Ultra if you need maximum battery life, consistently high frame rates in demanding games, and a phone that can handle extended periods of heavy use without throttling. Buy the vivo X200 Pro mini if you prefer a more pocketable flagship experience and value the latest MediaTek silicon, accepting a trade-off in overall endurance for a more compact design.