Xiaomi 14T vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term battery life and software support, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is the superior choice. Its impressive 42-hour endurance and 2000-cycle battery longevity outweigh the Xiaomi 14T’s faster charging, despite the 14T’s strong performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 14T | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 26 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 26 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back (Panda X) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 193 g or 195 g (6.81 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 2880Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min | 25W wired, PD, QC2, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black, Lemon Green | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Models | 2406APNFAG | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N |
| Price | € 337.12 / $ 469.99 / £ 373.06 | $ 249.74 / C$ 498.99 / £ 335.00 / € 387.00 / ₹ 34,180 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:00h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Xiaomi 14T
- Faster 67W wired charging
- Potentially stronger multi-core performance with Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Competitive price point (assumed)
- Shorter battery endurance compared to S24 FE
- Software update commitment likely shorter than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Exceptional battery life (42-hour endurance)
- Longer software support from Samsung
- Slightly brighter display
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Exynos 2400e may be prone to throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both the Xiaomi 14T and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE boast impressive displays, achieving peak brightness levels of 1355 nits and 1372 nits respectively. While the difference is minimal, the S24 FE’s slightly higher peak brightness provides a marginal advantage in direct sunlight. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), but given the price point, it's likely both utilize standard AMOLED panels. The S24 FE benefits from Samsung’s established display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction, though this requires independent testing. Bezels are assumed to be comparable, typical of modern smartphones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the focus should be on the main sensor and image processing. Samsung’s image processing is typically more saturated and contrast-rich, appealing to a wider audience. The Xiaomi 14T may offer a more natural look. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor is critical for low-light performance and video stabilization, a detail absent from the provided data. The 2MP macro camera on both devices is likely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi 14T utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) with its octa-core configuration (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510), while the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is powered by the Exynos 2400e (4nm) with a 10-core setup (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz). The Exynos 2400e’s more complex core arrangement doesn’t necessarily translate to superior real-world performance; the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is known for its efficiency and strong multi-core scores. Thermal management will be crucial for the Exynos, as early reports suggest potential throttling under sustained load. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the specific speed isn’t provided.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 14T in battery endurance, boasting a remarkable 42-hour rating and a claimed 2000 charge cycles. The 11:48h active use score for the S24 FE contrasts with the 11:32h of the 14T. While the Xiaomi 14T compensates with 67W wired charging (100% in 45 minutes), the S24 FE’s longevity is a more substantial benefit for most users. The S24 FE also offers 25W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes), 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging, providing greater versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 14T if you prioritize blazing-fast 67W charging and need a phone that can top up quickly between uses. It’s ideal for users who frequently run out of battery and need a rapid solution. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE if you value exceptional battery endurance, a more refined software experience with longer update commitments, and a slightly brighter display. It’s the better choice for users who want a phone that lasts all day and beyond.