Xiaomi 14T vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi 14T emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra offers comparable processing power to the Tensor G3, coupled with significantly faster 67W charging. However, the Pixel 8 Pro’s superior camera system and software support make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 14T | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 26 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 26 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back (Panda X) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 193 g or 195 g (6.81 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 2880Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black, Lemon Green | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | 2406APNFAG | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | € 337.12 / $ 469.99 / £ 373.06 | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi 14T
- Faster 67W wired charging
- Potentially better multi-core performance with Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- More competitive price point
- Likely less advanced camera system
- Software updates may be less frequent
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Superior camera quality and computational photography
- Guaranteed software updates and AI features
- Brighter display with LTPO technology
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ significantly. The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a higher peak brightness of 1600 nits compared to the Xiaomi 14T’s 1355 nits, resulting in better visibility in direct sunlight. While both are excellent, the Pixel 8 Pro’s display is likely to offer a more vibrant and punchy viewing experience. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO vs. standard OLED) and refresh rate are missing for the 14T, but the Pixel 8 Pro’s LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate scaling, improving battery efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable, given both are flagship-level devices.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera system is a clear differentiator. While specific sensor details are missing for the 14T, the Pixel 8 Pro’s emphasis on computational photography and image processing, combined with its likely larger main sensor, will deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also expected to be more advanced, benefiting from Google’s software optimizations. The 14T may offer competitive hardware, but it will struggle to match the Pixel 8 Pro’s software-driven image processing prowess. Ignoring any potential 2MP macro lenses on either device, the focus should be on the primary and ultrawide sensors.
Performance
The Xiaomi 14T’s MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra and the Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3 both utilize a 4nm process, but their core configurations differ. The 14T employs an octa-core setup with a 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core, while the Pixel 8 Pro features a nona-core configuration with a 3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core. The Cortex-X3 generally offers higher single-core performance, but the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s more numerous A715 cores could provide an edge in multi-threaded tasks. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but specific speeds are unknown. Thermal management will be crucial; the Tensor G3 has historically been prone to throttling under sustained load, a potential area where the Dimensity 8300 Ultra could excel.
Battery Life
Both phones offer comparable battery life, with the Xiaomi 14T achieving 11:32h of active use and the Pixel 8 Pro managing 11:14h. However, their charging speeds are drastically different. The Xiaomi 14T’s 67W wired charging can fully charge the battery in 45 minutes, while the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W charging takes considerably longer (50% in 30 minutes). The Pixel 8 Pro also supports 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the 14T. The Pixel 8 Pro’s older 90h endurance rating is less relevant than the measured active use score, but it suggests a generally efficient power management system.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 14T if you need a powerful all-rounder with exceptional charging speeds and a bright display, all at a more accessible price point. It’s ideal for gamers, power users, and those who value performance-per-dollar. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize camera quality, a seamless software experience with guaranteed updates, and advanced AI features. It’s the better choice for photography lovers, Google ecosystem users, and those who want a phone that gets smarter over time.