Xiaomi 14T vs Asus Zenfone 10: Which Android Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and efficient performance, the Asus Zenfone 10 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a noticeable advantage in sustained performance and power efficiency, resulting in a longer 13:05 active use score compared to the Xiaomi 14T’s 11:32h.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 14T | Asus Zenfone 10 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 26 | 2023, June 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 26 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back (Panda X) | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 146.5 x 68.1 x 9.4 mm (5.77 x 2.68 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g or 195 g (6.81 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~445 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.92 inches, 84.6 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 2880Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120° (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Features | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, QC4 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black, Lemon Green | Starry Blue, Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Eclipse Red, Comet White |
| Models | 2406APNFAG | AI2302 |
| Price | € 337.12 / $ 469.99 / £ 373.06 | About 2300 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi 14T
- Faster 67W wired charging
- Brighter display (1355 nits)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Shorter battery life (11:32h)
- Less efficient chipset
- Larger form factor
Asus Zenfone 10
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Longer battery life (13:05h)
- Compact and pocketable design
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Dimmer display (807 nits)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1355 nits, making it ideal for use in direct sunlight. The Zenfone 10, while still respectable at 807 nits, falls considerably short in peak brightness. However, the Zenfone 10’s smaller 5.9-inch screen contributes to a higher pixel density, potentially offering a sharper image. Neither specification details panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED), but both are expected to utilize AMOLED for vibrant colors. The brightness difference will be most noticeable outdoors, favoring the 14T.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited regarding camera specifics. However, the Zenfone 10’s reputation suggests a focus on image quality and video stabilization. The Xiaomi 14T, while likely offering a versatile camera system, may prioritize megapixels over sensor size and image processing quality. Without detailed sensor size and aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The absence of details on the Xiaomi 14T’s camera suggests it may not be a primary differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Asus Zenfone 10’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a 1+2+2+3 core configuration with a Cortex-X3 prime core, designed for peak performance. The Xiaomi 14T’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) employs a 1+3+4 core setup with Cortex-A715 cores. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture is optimized for sustained performance and thermal efficiency. The Zenfone 10’s CPU configuration, with its Cortex-X3, is expected to outperform the 14T in demanding tasks. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but the Zenfone 10’s superior chipset will be the primary performance driver.
Battery Life
The Asus Zenfone 10 achieves a remarkable 13:05h active use score, despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (not specified). This is a testament to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s power efficiency. The Xiaomi 14T, with 11:32h, offers respectable battery life, but falls short. The 14T compensates with significantly faster 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 45 minutes, compared to the Zenfone 10’s 30W charging. The Zenfone 10 also offers 15W wireless and 5W reverse wired charging, features absent on the 14T.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 14T if you prioritize fast charging (67W) and a brighter display (1355 nits) for outdoor visibility, and are comfortable with a larger form factor. Buy the Asus Zenfone 10 if you prefer a truly pocketable flagship experience, value long-term battery life, and demand top-tier performance in a compact package, even if it means slower charging.