Xiaomi 12X vs. Poco F5: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and slightly better battery endurance. While the 12X offers a more compact design and the Snapdragon 870, the F5's performance advantage makes it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12X | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 28 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 31 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 152.7 x 69.9 x 8.2 mm (6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1 / 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 39 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 2112123AC, 2112123AG | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 598003 (v8), 690298 (v9) GeekBench: 3168 (v5.1) GFXBench: 47fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi 12X
- Compact and premium design
- Reliable Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Fast 67W charging
- Good image processing (assumed)
- Less powerful than Poco F5
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially lower refresh rate
- Older chipset
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Brighter display
- Excellent value for money
- Longer battery endurance
- Larger form factor
- Potentially less refined design
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significant advantage with its measured 963 nits max brightness, making it far more usable outdoors. Both phones claim an 'infinite' contrast ratio, which is a nominal term. While the 12X's display is perfectly adequate, the F5's brightness provides a noticeably better viewing experience, especially in sunlight. The Poco F5 also likely has a higher refresh rate (assumed 120Hz) compared to the 12X (assumed 60Hz or 90Hz).
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the 12X is expected to have slightly better image processing due to Xiaomi's tuning, but the F5's hardware (likely a higher resolution main sensor) could potentially capture more detail. Real-world camera performance will depend on software optimization and specific shooting conditions. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a substantial upgrade over the 12X's Snapdragon 870. The 7+ Gen 2 offers significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. While the 870 is still a capable chip, the F5's newer architecture and 4nm process provide a clear edge.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 holds a slight advantage in battery life, with an endurance rating of 118h compared to the 12X's 105h. Both phones support 67W fast charging, with the F5 taking approximately 46 minutes to charge fully, while the 12X takes 39 minutes. The difference in charging time is minimal, but the slightly longer endurance rating gives the F5 a small edge.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi 12X is ideal for users prioritizing a more compact form factor and a proven, reliable chipset. It's a good choice for those who value a premium feel and don't need the absolute best performance. The Poco F5 is perfect for gamers, power users, and anyone seeking a high-performance smartphone with a vibrant display at an aggressive price point.