Xiaomi 12T vs vivo iQOO 11S: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo iQOO 11S emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a significant performance uplift, particularly in demanding tasks and gaming, and the 200W charging is a game-changer. However, the Xiaomi 12T remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12T | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 04 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 06 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Ultra (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, MIUI 14 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 19 min | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | 22071212AG | V2304A |
| Price | € 181.96 / £ 283.32 | About 500 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 104h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 780204 (v9) GeekBench: 3756 (v5.1) | - |
Xiaomi 12T
- Excellent battery endurance (104h)
- Competitive price point
- Fast 120W charging
- Older Dimensity 8100 Ultra chipset
- 5nm process less efficient than 4nm
vivo iQOO 11S
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Blazing-fast 200W charging
- More efficient 4nm process
- Potentially higher price
- Funtouch OS may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12T boasts a measured peak brightness of 954 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright conditions. While the iQOO 11S’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to expect similar or slightly higher brightness given its flagship positioning. Both displays feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. The absence of LTPO technology in the 12T means it likely lacks adaptive refresh rate capabilities, potentially impacting battery life during prolonged use compared to a potential implementation in the iQOO 11S.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, given the iQOO 11S’s flagship status, it’s likely to feature a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing. The Xiaomi 12T’s camera performance will likely be good, but the iQOO 11S is expected to excel in low-light conditions and offer greater dynamic range. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is impossible, but the iQOO 11S benefits from the overall higher tier of components.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 11S’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a clear upgrade over the Xiaomi 12T’s Dimensity 8100 Ultra (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, offers substantially improved single-core performance. The more efficient 4nm process also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The iQOO 11S’s CPU configuration (1+2+2+3) is also more modern and optimized than the 12T’s (4+4), further enhancing multi-tasking and responsiveness. While the 12T is no slouch, the iQOO 11S delivers a demonstrably smoother and faster experience.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 12T achieves an impressive endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting excellent battery optimization. However, the iQOO 11S compensates for any potential battery capacity difference with its revolutionary 200W wired charging. A full charge takes a mere 19 minutes on the 12T, but the iQOO 11S’s 200W charging, utilizing PD3.0 and UFCS, will be significantly faster. This allows the iQOO 11S to quickly top up its battery, mitigating any concerns about battery life, even with demanding usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 12T if you prioritize long-lasting battery life and a more established software ecosystem, and are comfortable with slightly less raw processing power. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you demand the absolute best performance, lightning-fast charging, and are willing to adapt to vivo’s Funtouch OS.