Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Xiaomi 12T: A Battle of Charging Speeds and Performance

The Xiaomi 12T and Realme GT Neo 5 240W represent distinct approaches to the mid-to-high range smartphone market. The 12T prioritizes a well-rounded experience with a solid endurance rating, while the GT Neo 5 240W aggressively pushes the boundaries of charging technology. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing balanced performance and longevity, the Xiaomi 12T emerges as the more sensible choice. Its 104-hour endurance rating and capable Dimensity 8100 Ultra chipset offer a reliable experience. However, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner for those who absolutely demand the fastest possible charging speeds.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi 12T Realme GT Neo 5 240W
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 661, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2022, October 042023, February 09
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, October 06Available. Released 2023, February 09
Body
Dimensions163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in)163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight202 g (7.13 oz)199 g (7.02 oz)
 -Illuminated RGB (on the back)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5-
Resolution1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density)1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak)AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8100 Ultra (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G610 MC6Adreno 730
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 14, MIUI 14Android 13, Realme UI 4.0
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single-16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
Triple108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
Video1080p@30/60fps, HDR1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (dual side)
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired, 100% in 19 min240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAh4600 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Silver, BluePurple, Black, White
Models22071212AGRMX3708
Price€ 181.96 / £ 283.32About 440 EUR
SAR1.09 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.99 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)-
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 104h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -25.0 LUFS (Very good) -
Performance AnTuTu: 780204 (v9) GeekBench: 3756 (v5.1)-

Xiaomi 12T

  • Excellent 104-hour endurance rating
  • Capable Dimensity 8100 Ultra processor
  • 954 nits peak brightness for good outdoor visibility

  • Slower charging speed compared to the GT Neo 5
  • Camera specifications are unknown, potentially limiting performance

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

  • Blazing-fast 240W charging (100% in 10 minutes)
  • Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
  • Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process

  • Potentially shorter battery lifespan due to extreme charging speeds
  • Endurance rating is unknown, suggesting potentially lower battery life

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 12T boasts a display capable of reaching 954 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even outdoors. While the Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s display specifications aren’t provided, Realme typically focuses on high refresh rates in this series. The 12T’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks. Without specific details on the GT Neo 5’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate), it’s difficult to assess its advantages beyond potential refresh rate differences. The 12T’s brightness is a known quantity, providing a clear advantage for outdoor use.

Camera Comparison

Both devices are listed with ‘Photo / Video’ capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, Realme’s GT series often prioritizes camera features, potentially offering a more versatile camera system. The absence of details on either phone suggests a focus on software processing rather than groundbreaking hardware. We can assume both will offer acceptable image quality for social media and casual use, but neither is likely to challenge flagship camera performance.

Performance

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a flagship-level chipset known for its strong performance. Its CPU configuration – 1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides a performance edge over the Xiaomi 12T’s Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Ultra (5nm). The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally translates to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. However, the Dimensity 8100 Ultra remains a very capable performer, and the 5nm node is still efficient. The Snapdragon’s Cortex-X2 core provides a significant boost in single-core performance, benefiting responsiveness and certain applications.

Battery Life

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s headline feature is its 240W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Xiaomi 12T’s 120W charging, which takes 19 minutes for a full charge. However, the Xiaomi 12T boasts an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting a more efficient power draw and potentially a larger battery capacity. The GT Neo 5’s aggressive charging speed may come at the cost of long-term battery health, while the 12T prioritizes sustained battery life. The trade-off is clear: speed versus longevity.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi 12T if you need a phone that will comfortably last a full day and offers a consistently smooth experience across everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize minimizing downtime and frequently need to top up your battery quickly, even if it means sacrificing some long-term endurance.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the 240W charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W significantly degrade the battery health over time?
While 240W charging is incredibly fast, it does generate more heat. Realme likely employs sophisticated charging algorithms and thermal management to mitigate battery degradation. However, it's reasonable to expect some degree of capacity loss over the long term compared to slower charging methods. The Xiaomi 12T’s 120W charging is less aggressive and may result in slower, but more sustained, battery health.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT Neo 5 240W prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to run hot under sustained load, but the GT Neo 5 240W likely incorporates cooling solutions to manage temperatures. The 4nm process helps with efficiency, but demanding games will still generate heat. The Xiaomi 12T’s Dimensity 8100 Ultra, built on a 5nm process, may offer slightly better thermal performance in prolonged gaming scenarios.
❓ How does the Dimensity 8100 Ultra in the Xiaomi 12T perform in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 8100 Ultra is a very capable chipset and can handle Genshin Impact at high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't match the absolute peak performance of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience. Expect to be able to play for extended periods without significant throttling.